How do enrollees with private health insurance use remote monitoring technologies? By Lynne Cotter, Corinna Cline, Julia Harris, Gary Claxton, and Matthew Rae Twitter November 6, 2025

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/how-do-enrollees-with-private-health-insurance-use-remote-monitoring-technologies/?utm_campaign=KFF-Peterson&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8CD833wBSgu-ypsTy1FcmNQoYpCfqL13o9skZlPw3qaXwmPhVrXBTM6Mf3FlJCICb4sJ5B83AGUn1xlX8ms-t4i6_E-w&_hsmi=388762800&utm_content=388762800&utm_source=hs_email Peterson-KFF Analysis Examines Who Uses Remote Monitoring Technologies and How Much Is Spent There are an estimated 300,000 adults with employer-sponsored health coverage for whom insurers received at least one remote monitoring claim in 2023, yet little is currently known about the growing use of this service as a part of newly available digital health care tools. A new Healthy System Tracker analysis authored by KFF and the Peterson Center on Healthcare examines remote monitoring technologies, identifying the types of patients and health conditions they serve and what is spent on these services. Among adults under 65 with private health insurance, older people and women are most likely to use remote monitoring. These services are mostly used for people with hypertension and other circulatory diseases, and musculoskeletal conditions. The median cost of remote monitoring varies, ranging from $55 a month ($12 out of pocket) for a clinician to monitor physical data, such as blood pressure, to $78 a month ($21 out of pocket) for a provider to monitor self-reported data, such as pain.