Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
Editor
BioEdge
Hi there,
Even writing a short column like this one is a tough job. Those who agree with you expect more gold when the lode is nearly exhausted; those who disagree with you demand minute documentation; those who are merely curious will not return if the punctuation is sloppy. There’s a deadline and it has to be posted quickly. It can make you quite dyspeptic.
Which perhaps explains a post written by the incoming associate editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics, Brian D. Earp. An Oxford theologian, Nigel Biggars, argues in the JME that there is a place for religion in bioethics and medicine. (See below.) Fiddlesticks, says Earp. “Some people will feel a shiver go down their spines—and not only the non-religious.”
I thought for a moment that he must have been referring to the intersection of religion and cardiology documented in The Discovery And Conquest Of Mexico, by Bernal Diaz. (A fabulous read, by the way.)
"The dismal drum of Huichilobos sounded again, accompanied by conches, horns, and trumpet-like instruments. It was a terrifying sound, and when we looked at the tall cue [temple-pyramid] from which it came we saw our comrades who had been captured in Cortés defeat being dragged up the steps to be sacrificed. …Then after they had danced the papas [Aztec priests] laid them down on their backs on some narrow stones of sacrifice and, cutting open their chests, drew out their palpitating hearts which they offered to the idols before them."
But no, Earp was referring to Christianity, whose distinctive contribution to medicine, apparently, is to deny women life-saving abortions. It’s odd that he ignored the Good Samaritan ethic which gave rise to the modern hospital system and the well-documented origin of bioethics in Catholic medical ethics. And, as Biggar points out, notions of human dignity and a preferential option for the poor are grounded in Christian ethics.
If we are looking for a philosophy to animate good medical care, we could do worse than Christianity, quite a bit worse. I think that the jury is still out on whether religion-less, secular medical ethics has really been a big improvement.
| This week in BioEdge | |
by Michael Cook | Feb 28, 2015
Why don't we know more about the neurological effects of the contraceptive Pill?
by Michael Cook | Feb 28, 2015
The notion that religious convictions have no place in medicine or bioethics is widespread and growing.
by Michael Cook | Feb 28, 2015
Head transplants are a familiar theme in B-grade sci fi films which lends itself to an infinitude of excruciating puns.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 28, 2015
One bioethicist has offered a thoughtful defense of what many claim is a scientific flight of fancy.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 28, 2015
Thailand has passed a law to outlaw the use of Thai surrogates by foreign couples.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 28, 2015
The Pakistani government has made safe-haven for refugees conditional on receiving polio vaccinations.
by Michael Cook | Feb 28, 2015
The debate over psychiatrists’ confidentiality in treating people with mental illness has revived.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 28, 2015
A British woman wants to give birth via IVF to the child of her dead daughter.
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario