Factors Associated With Hospital Decisions to Purchase Robotic Surgical Systems - PubMed

Factors Associated With Hospital Decisions to Purchase Robotic Surgical Systems - PubMed

Factors Associated With Hospital Decisions to Purchase Robotic Surgical Systems

Chan Shen 1, Dian Gu 2, Roger Klein 3, Shouhao Zhou 4, Ya-Chen T Shih 2, Thomas Tracy 1, David Soybel 1, Peter Dillon 1

Affiliations 

• PMID: 32072012
 
• PMCID: PMC6997967
 
• DOI: 10.1177/2381468320904364

Abstract

Background. Robotic surgical systems are expensive to own and operate, and the purchase of such technology is an important decision for hospital administrators. Most prior literature focuses on the comparison of clinical outcomes between robotic surgery and other laparoscopic or open surgery. There is a knowledge gap about what drives hospitals' decisions to purchase robotic systems. Objective. To identify factors associated with a hospital's acquisition of advanced surgical systems. Method. We used 2002 to 2011 data from the State of California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to examine robotic surgical system purchase decisions of 476 hospitals. We used a probit estimation allowing heteroscedasticity in the error term including a set of two equations: one binary response equation and one heteroscedasticity equation. Results. During the study timeframe, there were 78 robotic surgical systems purchased by hospitals in the sample. Controlling for hospital characteristics such as number of available beds, teaching status, nonprofit status, and patient mix, the probit estimation showed that market-level directly relevant surgery volume in the previous year (excluding the hospital's own volume) had the largest impact. More specifically, hospitals in high volume (>50,000 surgeries v. 0) markets were 12 percentage points more likely to purchase robotic systems. We also found that hospitals in less competitive markets (i.e., Herfindahl index above 2500) were 2 percentage points more likely to purchase robotic systems. Limitations. This study has limitations common to observational database studies. Certain characteristics such as cultural factors cannot be accurately quantified. Conclusions. Our findings imply that potential market demand is a strong driver for hospital purchase of robotic surgical systems. Market competition does not significantly increase the adoption of new expensive surgical technologies.

Keywords: health care market; hospital administration; robotic surgical system.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

• Do Robotic Surgical Systems Improve Profit Margins? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of California Hospitals.

  Shih YT, Shen C, Hu JC.Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1221-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 20.PMID: 28964456 Free PMC article.
• Effect of Regional Hospital Competition and Hospital Financial Status on the Use of Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

  Wright JD, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Burke WM, Chen L, Hu JC, Neugut AI, Ananth CV, Hershman DL.JAMA Surg. 2016 Jul 1;151(7):612-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5508.PMID: 26886156
• Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume.

  Barbash GI, Friedman B, Glied SA, Steiner CA.Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5c8b8.PMID: 23965894 Clinical Trial.
• [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

  Amato L, Colais P, Davoli M, Ferroni E, Fusco D, Minozzi S, Moirano F, Sciattella P, Vecchi S, Ventura M, Perucci CA.Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.PMID: 23851286 Review. Italian.
• Robotic lung cancer surgery: review of experience and costs.

  Novellis P, Alloisio M, Vanni E, Bottoni E, Cariboni U, Veronesi G.J Vis Surg. 2017 Mar 31;3:39. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.05. eCollection 2017.PMID: 29078602 Free PMC article. Review.