sábado, 29 de agosto de 2020

BioEdge: Scotland: legal battle over trans girl’s sperm

BioEdge: Scotland: legal battle over trans girl’s sperm

Bioedge

Scotland: legal battle over trans girl’s sperm
    
Ellie Anderson / from Change.Org petition 
For the latest episode in the Reproductive Revolution, BioEdge turns to Scotland. A 16-year-old transgender girl, Ellie Anderson, died last month of “unascertained” causes after commencing hormone therapy.
Two years before, Ellie, whose mother Louise says that she had identified as a girl since she was three years old, had frozen her sperm so that she could have two children with the help of an egg donor and a surrogate mother.
"As a teenager she delayed hormone blockers to save her sperm to enable her to have her own biological children,” Ms Anderson told the BBC. “She had made me promise that if anything were to happen to her, her children would be brought into the world. I am going to do everything I can to honour her wishes - not just for her but for anyone else who is caught in this position. It kind of sparked a little fire in my belly and I want to make her wishes come true."
However, this is not legally possible in the UK and the sperm is supposed to be destroyed, although lawyers are suing to stop this. If Ellie had been in a relationship when she died, her partner would have had the right to ask for her sperm to be retained. Her mother does not have that right.
The lawyer described Ms Anderson’s request as an "unusual, interesting, important and complex legal issue".
"What we're trying to achieve would be to get an order from the court that Ellie's mum would be entitled to make use of her sperm for the purpose that Ellie intended - that being to create a genetic child of hers and a grandchild for Ms Anderson."
If this does not succeed, they hope that the court will back a change in the law.
It will be interesting to see if an autopsy implicates the hormone treatment in the 16-year-old’s premature death.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Bioedge

Like the Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, Republican President Donald Trump touched upon a number of bioethical issues when he accepted his nomination this week.

I found it surprising that Trump devoted so much time to broadcasting his anti-abortion, pro-life message. It's not surprising -- his Administration has worked against Planned Parenthood and backed nominees to the Supreme Court who appeared to be anti-abortion.

But Trump did so boldly and without equivocation when he could have just settled for some boilerplate, His team must have calculated that it is an election-winning issue, no matter how polarising it appears to be. Is this a sign that public opinion is changing on this key bioethical issue?

Michael Cook 
Editor 
    
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Takes a strong stand against abortion and lockdowns
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Bert Keizer says that expanding the criteria for euthanasia eligibility is the path of progress
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Mother fights to use frozen sperm to create a grandchild
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Anti-lockdown protests, however, are not justifiable
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Staff claim that some hospitals had a “no admissions” policy– even for conditions such as heart attacks
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
A fascinating intersectional analysis of the UK’s shortage
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 29, 2020
Theodore Dalrymple wields his scalpel in a new book
 
 
IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Alexandra Minna Stern | Aug 29, 2020
More than 60,000 people were sterilized in 32 states during the 20th century based on the bogus “science” of eugenics
Bioedge

BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario