Readiness and Implementation of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small- and Medium-Sized Primary Care Practices: an Observational Study
Affiliations
- PMID: 32779136
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05978-w
Abstract
Background: Little is known about what determines strategy implementation around quality improvement (QI) in small- and medium-sized practices. Key questions are whether QI strategies are associated with practice readiness and practice characteristics.
Objective: Grounded in organizational readiness theory, we examined how readiness and practice characteristics affect QI strategy implementation. The study was a component of a larger practice-level intervention, Heart of Virginia Healthcare, which sought to transform primary care while improving cardiovascular care.
Design: This observational study analyzed practice correlates of QI strategy implementation in primary care at 3 and 12 months. Data were derived from surveys completed by clinicians and staff and from assessments by practice coaches.
Participants: A total of 175 small- and medium-sized primary care practices were included.
Main measures: Outcome was QI strategy implementation in three domains: (1) aspirin, blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking cessation (ABCS); (2) care coordination; and (3) organizational-level improvement. Coaches assessed implementation at 3 and 12 months. Readiness was measured by baseline member surveys, 1831 responses from 175 practices, a response rate of 73%. Practice survey assessed practice characteristics, a response rate of 93%. We used multivariate regression.
Key results: QI strategy implementation increased from 3 to 12 months: the mean for ABCS from 1.20 to 1.59, care coordination from 2.15 to 2.75, organizational improvement from 1.37 to 1.78 (95% CI). There was no statistically significant association between readiness and QI strategy implementation across domains. Independent practice implementation was statistically significantly higher than hospital-owned practices at 3 months for ABCS (95% CI, P = 0.01) and care coordination (95% CI, P = 0.03), and at 12 months for care coordination (95% CI, P = 0.04).
Conclusion: QI strategy implementation varies by practice ownership. Independent practices focus on patient care-related activities. FQHCs may need additional time to adopt and implement QI activities. Practice readiness may require more structural and organizational changes before starting a QI effort.
Keywords: hospital-owned practice; independent practice; organizational readiness; primary care; quality improvement; strategic activity; strategy implementation.
Similar articles
- Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3189-4.PMID: 29866120 Free PMC article.
- Does Ownership Make a Difference in Primary Care Practice?J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):398-407. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180271.PMID: 31068404 Free PMC article.
- Effects of 2 Forms of Practice Facilitation on Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care: A Practice-randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.Med Care. 2020 Apr;58(4):344-351. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001260.PMID: 31876643 Clinical Trial.
- Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 6: Prevention of Healthcare–Associated Infections).Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Jan. Report No.: 04(07)-0051-6.PMID: 20734530 Free Books & Documents. Review.
- Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 15;1(1):CD012054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012054.pub2.PMID: 29333660 Free PMC article. Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario