A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care

Kia Toft ThomsenEmail author View ORCID ID profile,
Mai-Britt Guldin,
Mette Kjærgaard Nielsen,
Chaitali Laura Ollars and
Anders Bonde Jensen

BMC Palliative CareBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201716:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0196-x

Received: 8 December 2016
Accepted: 23 March 2017
Published: 8 April 2017

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Caregiving is strenuous and it may be associated with adverse psychological outcomes. During the palliative care trajectory, there are unique opportunities for providing support and preventing poor bereavement outcome. However, the tasks of palliative care staff in relation to caregivers are often unclear in the daily practice. Assessment is recommended to establish risk and needs and standards for caregiver support are available. Still, the feasibility of applying these standards among caregivers in everyday clinical practice has not been tested so far.

Methods

This study tested the feasibility of an intervention based on key elements of the “Bereavement support standards for specialist palliative care services” in a Danish specialised palliative home care team. We followed the UK Medical Research Council’s guidelines for the process evaluation of complex interventions. The intervention consisted of: 1. Systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers at care entry; 2. Interdisciplinary conference to prepare a support plan; 3. Targeted support; 4. The establishment of an electronic medical record for caregivers to document targeted support. Outcomes included the reach, fidelity and acceptability of the intervention as well as the assessment of contextual factors.

Results

The intervention reached 76 of 164 caregivers (46%). The interdisciplinary risk assessment and documentation of a support plan was conducted in 57 (75%) of the enrolled caregivers. Finally, a separate medical record was established according to the intervention blueprint for 62% of caregivers receiving targeted support. After managing initial challenges, palliative care staff reported that the intervention was useful and acceptable.

Conclusion

The intervention proved feasible and useful. Still, we identified barriers to the implementation which should be taken into consideration when planning implementation of a systematic risk and needs assessment and in the establishment of medical records for caregivers.