50 years after Stonewall, we can’t ignore transgender health, says bioethicist
by Michael Cook | 6 Jul 2019 |
June was a month of “pride” for the LGBTQI+ community. But the co-editor of the blog of the American Journal of Bioethics, Keisha Rey, writes that despite progress in the 50 years since the Stonewall Inn riots in Greenwich Village, the health of transgender people is still precarious. She points out two battlefronts.
First, she says, new regulations from the Trump Administration’s Department of Health and Human Services declare that health care providers may refuse to care for transgender patients if doing so violates their religious beliefs.
Second, the Department of Housing and Urban Development plans to allow federally funded shelters to keep out homeless transgender people. They will be forced to live in single-sex shelters that match their identified gender or they will be turned away.
She also highlighted the case of a transwoman philosopher who announced on Medium that she was leaving the profession because of pressure from trans-exclusionary radical feminists. “The discipline of philosophy is very hostile to transgender people and that hostility is instigated by influential philosophers and academic groups in the field,” wrote Dr Rey.
“While we are dancing, singing, and enjoying life with our LGBTQ family and friends let us remember [transgenders’] fight to lead healthy lives is a daily fight and let us not leave them in the trenches when June is over and the parades have stopped,” she concludes.
The world’s leading science journal, Nature, also strongly backed LGBTQI+ rights in a forceful editorial on the occasion of the International Day of LGBTQ+ People in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths on July 5.
“Living in fear or not being able to show their true selves harms individuals. Keeping people from doing their best science, or excluding them, harms everyone. ... Nature, too, has much more to do to promote equality for all marginalized groups. Scientists should never be made to feel that hiding their sexual or gender orientation is the solution.”
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
L’Affaire Vincent Lambert, as the French call it, seems to be just about over. Doctors are going to remove hydration and nutrition from the 42-year-old nurse, who was severely brain-damaged in an accident in 2008. The appeal process initiated by his parents to keep him alive has ground to a halt now that France’s highest court has ruled on the case. It will be interesting to see whether more of the 1700 patients in his situation in France will also be given what is called in France “passive euthanasia“.
 Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |  |  |  |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
France’s highest court rules that doctors can remove hydration and nutrition by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
Two British bioethicists at loggerheads by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
New Zealand bioethicists propose breaking up the traditional division by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
College finds that Norman Barwin acted in “a disgraceful, dishonorable or unprofessional” way by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
Nature strongly backs LGBTQI+ rights by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
NEJM article shows that 15% of people with severe head injuries have some consciousness by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
The possibility increases pressure to take up the option by Michael Cook | Jul 06, 2019
New head for the National Catholic Bioethics Center BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario