Implementation Considerations for Offering Personal Genomic Risk Information to the Public: A Qualitative Study
Affiliations
- PMID: 32600382
- PMCID: PMC7325160
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09143-0
Abstract
Background: Genomic risk information, based on common genomic susceptibility variants associated with risk of complex diseases such as cancer, may be incorporated into personalised prevention and screening strategies. We aimed to engage with members of the public, who are important stakeholders in this process, to further inform program development and other implementation outcomes such as acceptability and appropriateness.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 30 participants (aged 24-69 years, 50% female) recruited from a pilot trial in which they received personalised genomic risk information for melanoma. We explored participants' views and attitudes towards offering general personal genomic risk information to the broader population. The data were analysed thematically.
Results: Two overarching themes relevant to implementation considerations were identified. Firstly, participants' preferences for accepting an offer of genomic risk information were based on family history, disease incidence and the possibility of prevention. Secondly, participants felt that the processes for offering risk information should be based on individual preferences, triaged according to risk and be supported by a health professional trained in genomics.
Conclusions: Participants felt that offering personal genomic risk information to the general population to inform prevention and early detection recommendations is acceptable, particularly for common, complex conditions such as cancer. Understanding participants' preferences for receiving genomic risk information will assist with communication strategies and health workforce planning. We anticipate that these findings will contribute to the development of implementation strategies for incorporating genomic risk information into routine clinical practice.
Keywords: Early detection; Genomics; Implementation; Population; Prevention; Risk.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
- 'There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs': public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening.J Med Ethics. 2020 May 20:medethics-2019-105934. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105934. Online ahead of print.PMID: 32434901
- GP attitudes to and expectations for providing personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.BJGP Open. 2019 Feb 20;3(1):bjgpopen18X101633. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101633. eCollection 2019 Apr.PMID: 31049413 Free PMC article.
- Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1203-1214. doi: 10.1111/hex.12406. Epub 2015 Sep 1.PMID: 26332492 Free PMC article.
- Genomic medicine and risk prediction across the disease spectrum.Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(3):120-37. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2014.997930. Epub 2015 Jan 19.PMID: 25597499 Review.
- Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature review.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014 Nov;14(8):1053-65. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.961917. Epub 2014 Sep 26.PMID: 25260013 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario