sábado, 22 de agosto de 2020

BioEdge: Do we need to rethink nursing homes?

BioEdge: Do we need to rethink nursing homes?

Bioedge

Do we need to rethink nursing homes?
    
An article in Harper’s Magazine on deaths in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic is compulsory reading. About 40% of deaths in the United States have been in nursing homes. The figures are worse in other countries. According to journalist Andrew Cockburn, they may be as high as 75% in the UK and 64% in Norway.
But it is these paragraphs which should be considered in any discussion of the tragic pandemic:
the heavy death toll among the elderly might be traced to one main source: the neoliberal privatization craze that has swept the Western world over the past forty years.
However, an arid statistical table published last year by the World Health Organization suggests a more fundamental truth. It tabulates the number of nursing-home beds per hundred thousand people in each European country. Sweden scores very high—1,276 per hundred thousand. Britain is also high, at 847. The same computation puts the United States at 515. Greece, on the other hand, whose citizens tend not to put their elderly relatives in homes and still regard their care as a family responsibility, scores a mere 15.
The disparities in casualty rates are equally striking. In terms of deaths per hundred thousand, Sweden’s rate is 53; the United Kingdom comes in at 66; and the United States has 39. Greece, meanwhile, despite having the largest proportion of elderly people in Europe, has so far escaped with a mere 2 deaths per hundred thousand. One might almost conclude that the death toll that has so traumatized and destabilized much of Western society in 2020 was not wrought principally by the coronavirus, but by nursing homes.
Ideally, we might emulate Greek family relationships and arrangements (or move to Greece to grow old) and abandon the institutional-care approach in favor of a model where the bottom line is not the driving priority. 
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Bioedge

As I see it, there are only three topics worth talking about at the moment: Trump vs Biden, the coronavirus pandemic, and Trump vs Biden on the coronavirus pandemic. Sorry, there is a fourth, Christopher Nolan’s new film, Tenet, which looks quite intriguing, but does not fit into BioEdge very neatly.

Just after I finished writing today’s lead story about the Joe Biden’s acceptance speech, he expanded on its central theme: that he will do a better job ending the pandemic than Trump. In an interview with ABC TV, he declared that he would shut the country down rather than let the pandemic roar out of control.

“I will be prepared to do whatever it takes to save lives because we cannot get the country moving, until we control the virus,” Biden declared. “In order to keep the country running and moving and the economy growing, and people employed, you have to fix the virus, you have to deal with the virus.”

That puts bioethics at the very centre of this strange election.

Michael Cook 
Editor    
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
He laid the blame for death and disruption of the pandemic squarely at the feet of President Trump.
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
A revealing article in Harper's Magazine raises agonising questions
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
Should we question the public health benefits of abortion?
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
Transgender surgery in the United States is a kind of Wild Wild West of medicine
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
Why should we mourn the dead?
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 22, 2020
The gimmick provoked some controversy: “Imagine telling a child that they came from an Instagram giveaway.”    
Bioedge

BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: