sábado, 15 de agosto de 2020

Euthanasia polling data may fail to capture people’s considered views

Euthanasia polling data may fail to capture people’s considered views

Bioedge


Euthanasia polling data may fail to capture people’s considered views
    


Public support for euthanasia in countries like the United States is quite strong according existing polling data. But support appears to wane when respondents are given more detailed information about the complexities of medically-assisted suicide. 
A new paper in The American Journal of Geriatric Pyschiatry looks specifically at public attitudes to euthanasia for patients with dementia, and considers how respondents’ attitudes change when they are presented with case studies of individuals with severe dementia who have made an advanced request for euthanasia. 
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health administered an online survey to over 1700 US-based participants, matched to US population in age, sex, race and/or ethnicity, education, household income, and political affiliation. 
The survey began with a description of advanced dementia and then asked participants an initial policy question about their attitudes to the legalisation of advanced request euthanasia/assisted suicide (AR-EAS). Respondents were then asked to read a scenario involving a decisionally incapacitated patient with dementia with an advance request for EAS to be implemented when “...she is completely dependent on others and can no longer recognize her family”. After reading the scenario, respondents were then asked whether their attitudes towards the legalisation of AR-EAS had changed. 
Initial support for AR-EAS among respondents was 54%, with almost a quarter of respondents (22.6%) saying that they were unsure.  Factors associated with higher initial support toward AR-EAS legalization included younger age, being more liberal and nonreligious, and having a more negative perception of quality of life with dementia. 
However, the researchers found an overall decrease in support for legalization after participants read the scenarios. Indeed, in response to a follow-up policy question, only a minority agreed with legalization, ranging from 37% to 49% depending on the scenario they had been presented with. 
The study authors draw a methodological conclusion from their findings about how researchers should survey public attitudes to euthanasia. They state that “simply asking whether AR-EAS should be legal following a description of life with dementia may fail to capture the public’s considered views”. Rather, it is important that respondents are given insight into the complexities of illnesses like dementia. The authors note that there is a “tragedy discourse” surrounding advanced illness in later life, and that this biased picture of progressive illness can cloud people’s views on an issue like euthanasia.  
Xavier Symons is deputy editor of BioEdge
Bioedge

Russia has dashed across the finish line and seized the trophy for being the first nation to release a vaccine for Covid-19. It has been nicknamed “Sputnik 5”, recalling the Soviet Union’s glorious triumphs in the Space Race of the 1950s and 60s.

Scientists and bioethicists around the world, and even in Russia, have grave misgivings. Sputnik 5 has not even completed Phase 3 clinical trials. If the Russian vaccine is ineffective or unsafe, it could deter many people from being inoculated with an effective vaccine when it arrives.

By one of those awful coincidences which sometimes happen with new products, Sputnik 5 is being trialled at the same time as a Russian movie which is also called “Sputnik”. This, however, is a horror film about a guest which returns from outer space with an unlucky cosmonaut. It turns out to be a slithering extraterrestrial parasite which feasts on human brains. (Rated 90% on Rotten Tomatoes).

Is there a translation for Murphy’s Law?

Michael Cook
Editor, BioEdge 
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
President Putin says that one of his daughters has been inoculated
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
Different bioethics for different countries?
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
Almost 9 out of 10 who do late-term abortions
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
Let elephants go free, but keep ‘blasphemers’ locked up
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
Now it’s Japanese and Chinese who are the exploiters
 
 
by Michael Cook | Aug 15, 2020
Bernard-Henri Lévy, France’s rock-star public intellectual, has harsh words for health professionals
 
 
by Xavier Symons | Aug 15, 2020
A biased picture of progressive illness may cloud people’s views on euthanasia. 
Bioedge

BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: