Development of a rubric for assessing delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis
Affiliations
- PMID: 32589599
- DOI: 10.1515/dx-2020-0035
Abstract
Objectives Using case review to determine whether a patient experienced a delayed diagnosis is challenging. Measurement would be more accurate if case reviewers had access to multi-expert consensus on grading the likelihood of delayed diagnosis. Our objective was to use expert consensus to create a guide for objectively grading the likelihood of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, new-onset diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and sepsis. Methods Case vignettes were constructed for each condition. In each vignette, a patient has the condition and had a previous emergency department (ED) visit within 7 days. Condition-specific multi-specialty expert Delphi panels reviewed the case vignettes and graded the likelihood of a delayed diagnosis on a five-point scale. Delayed diagnosis was defined as the condition being present during the previous ED visit. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. In each Delphi round, panelists were given the scores from the previous round and asked to rescore. A case scoring guide was created from the consensus scores. Results Eighteen expert panelists participated. Consensus was achieved within three Delphi rounds for all appendicitis and sepsis vignettes. We reached consensus on 23/30 (77%) DKA vignettes. A case review guide was created from the consensus scores. Conclusions Multi-specialty expert reviewers can agree on the likelihood of a delayed diagnosis for cases of appendicitis and sepsis, and for most cases of DKA. We created a guide that can be used by researchers and quality improvement specialists to allow for objective case review to determine when delayed diagnoses have occurred for appendicitis, DKA, and sepsis.
Keywords: diagnostic error; diagnostic safety; error measurement.
Similar articles
- Accuracy of automated identification of delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis and sepsis in the ED.Emerg Med J. 2019 Dec;36(12):736-740. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208841. Epub 2019 Oct 9.PMID: 31597671
- Difficulties or mistakes in diagnosing type 1 diabetes mellitus in children? The consequences of delayed diagnosis.Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2008;14(1):7-12.PMID: 18577340
- Improving Emergency Department Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children.Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4):e20182984. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2984. Epub 2019 Sep 12.PMID: 31515299
- Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach.Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e5d8.PMID: 22382650 Review.
- Science peer review for the 21st century: Assessing scientific consensus for decision-making while managing conflict of interests, reviewer and process bias.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.PMID: 30634024 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario