Frailty as a Predictor of Death or New Disability After Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study - PubMed

Frailty as a Predictor of Death or New Disability After Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study - PubMed

Frailty as a Predictor of Death or New Disability After Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Daniel I McIsaac 1 2 3, Monica Taljaard 2 4, Gregory L Bryson 1 2 3, Paul E Beaulé 5, Sylvain Gagné 1, Gavin Hamilton 1, Emily Hladkowicz 6, Allen Huang 2 7, John A Joanisse 8, Luke T Lavallée 2 9, David MacDonald 10, Husein Moloo 2 11, Kednapa Thavorn 2 4, Carl van Walraven 2 12, Homer Yang 13, Alan J Forster 2 12

Affiliations 

• PMID: 30048320
 
• DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002967

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of the modified Fried Index (mFI) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) to predict death or patient-reported new disability 90 days after major elective surgery.

Background: The association of frailty with patient-reported outcomes, and comparisons between preoperative frailty instruments are poorly described.

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study. We determined frailty status in individuals ≥65 years having elective noncardiac surgery using the mFI and CFS. Outcomes included death or patient-reported new disability (primary); safety incidents, length of stay (LOS), and institutional discharge (secondary); ease of use, usefulness, benefit, clinical importance, and feasibility (tertiary). We measured the adjusted association of frailty with outcomes using regression analysis and compared true positive and false positive rates (TPR/FPR).

Results: Of 702 participants, 645 had complete follow up. The CFS identified 297 (42.3%) with frailty, the mFI 257 (36.6%); 72 (11.1%) died or experienced a new disability. Frailty was significantly associated with the primary outcome (CFS adjusted odds ratio, OR, 2.51, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.50-4.21; mFI adjusted-OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.57-4.31). TPR and FPR were not significantly different between instruments. Frailty was the only significant predictor of death or new disability in a multivariable analysis. Need for institutional discharge, costs and LOS were significantly increased in individuals with frailty. The CFS was easier to use, required less time and had less missing data.

Conclusions: Older people with frailty are significantly more likely to die or experience a new patient-reported disability after surgery. Clinicians performing frailty assessments before surgery should consider the CFS over the mFI as accuracy was similar, but ease of use and feasibility were higher.

Similar articles

• Prospective Comparison of Preoperative Predictive Performance Between 3 Leading Frailty Instruments.

  McIsaac DI, Harris EP, Hladkowicz E, Moloo H, Lalu MM, Bryson GL, Huang A, Joanisse J, Hamilton GM, Forster AJ, van Walraven C.Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):263-272. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004475.PMID: 31569165 Clinical Trial.
• Comparative assessment of two frailty instruments for risk-stratification in elderly surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.

  McIsaac DI, Taljaard M, Bryson GL, Beaule PE, Gagne S, Hamilton G, Hladkowicz E, Huang A, Joanisse J, Lavallée LT, Moloo H, Thavorn K, van Walraven C, Yang H, Forster AJ.BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0276-0.PMID: 27842511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• The Association of Frailty With Outcomes and Resource Use After Emergency General Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

  McIsaac DI, Moloo H, Bryson GL, van Walraven C.Anesth Analg. 2017 May;124(5):1653-1661. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001960.PMID: 28431425 Clinical Trial.
• Frailty assessment in thoracic surgery.

  Dunne MJ, Abah U, Scarci M.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):667-70. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt542. Epub 2014 Jan 27.PMID: 24473474 Review.
• The Comprehensive Complication Index is Related to Frailty in Elderly Surgical Patients.

  Artiles-Armas M, Roque-Castellano C, Conde-Martel A, Marchena-Gómez J.J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 10.PMID: 31301477 Review.