Reasons Patients Choose the Emergency Department over Primary Care: a Qualitative Metasynthesis
Affiliations
- PMID: 31428988
- PMCID: PMC6848423
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05128-x
Abstract
Background: To enhance the acute care delivery system, a comprehensive understanding of the patient's perspectives for seeking care in the emergency department (ED) versus primary care (PC) is necessary.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative metasynthesis on reasons patients seek care in the ED instead of PC. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, Psych Info, and Web of Science was completed to identify qualitative studies relevant to the research question. Articles were critically appraised using the McMaster University Critical Review Form for Qualitative Studies. We excluded pediatric articles and nonqualitative and mixed-methods studies. The metasynthesis was completed with an interpretive approach using reciprocal translation analyses.
Results: Nine articles met criteria for inclusion. Eleven themes under four domains were identified. The first domain was acuity of condition that led to the ED visit. In this domain, themes included pain: "it's urgent because it hurts," and concern for severe illness. The second domain was barriers associated with PC, which included difficulty accessing PC when ill: "my doctor said he was booked up and he instructed me to go to the ED." The third domain was related to multiple advantages associated with ED care: "my doctor cannot do X-rays and laboratory tests, while the ED has all the technical support." In this domain, patients also identified 24/7 accessibility of the ED and no need for an immediate copay at the ED as advantageous. The fourth domain included fulfillment of medical needs. Themes in this domain included the alleviation of pain and the perceived expertise of the ED healthcare providers.
Conclusions: In this qualitative metasynthesis, reasons patients visit the ED over primary care included (1) urgency of the medical condition, (2) barriers to accessing primary care, (3) advantages of the ED, and (4) fulfillment of medical needs and quality of care in the ED.
Keywords: access to care; healthcare delivery; metasynthesis; patient preferences; patient-centered care; primary care; qualitative research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Similar articles
- Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1137-1149. doi: 10.1111/acem.13220. Epub 2017 Jun 19.PMID: 28493626 Free PMC article. Review.
- Exploring parents' reasons for attending the emergency department for children with minor illnesses: a mixed methods systematic review.Emerg Med J. 2019 Jan;36(1):39-46. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207118. Epub 2018 Nov 2.PMID: 30389792
- Enroling and retaining human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients in their care: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Oct;62:126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 25.PMID: 27494428 Free PMC article. Review.
- The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.PMID: 26571289
- Understanding Pediatric Caretakers' Views on Obtaining Medical Care for Low-acuity Illness.Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;25(9):1004-1013. doi: 10.1111/acem.13436. Epub 2018 Jun 1.PMID: 29741232
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario