Trump strengthens conscience rights of health care workers
by Michael Cook | 5 May 2019 |
The Trump administration is putting the finishing touches on new rules to make it easier for health care workers to refuse to provide services that violate their religious or moral beliefs.
The guidelines will protect "physicians, pharmacists, nurses, teachers, students and faith-based charities," President Donald Trump said during Rose Garden remarks noting the National Day of Prayer. "Together, we are building a culture that cherishes the dignity and worth of human life."
The administration said the new rules will strengthen enforcement of more than two dozen existing federal laws protecting conscience rights. “People and organizations do not have to shed their religious beliefs simply to help others in health care,” said Roger Severino, the director at the Department of Health and Human Services office for civil rights.
The move was swiftly criticised. “Religious liberty is a fundamental right, but it doesn’t include the right to discriminate or harm others,” said Louise Melling, of the American Civil Liberties Union. “This rule threatens to prevent people from accessing critical medical care and may endanger people’s lives. … Medical standards, not religious belief, should guide medical care.”
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra suggested that his state may take the Federal Government to court. "It’s 2019, not 1920. We won’t go back to the days when Americans seeking healthcare faced discrimination simply because they were female or LGBTQ," he said.
Melanie Israel, of The Heritage Foundation, took a more positive view of the Administration’s move: “The freedom to act, work and live in accordance with one’s conscience is a fundamental American principle. No person or entity should face discrimination or coercion for declining to participate in procedures, such as abortion or physician-assisted suicide, that violate sincere moral, ethical, or religious beliefs...
“For more than 40 years, federal law has protected conscience rights of Americans in the context of health care. While the Obama administration provided inadequate enforcement and oversight of federal conscience statutes, this final rule ensures that HHS will safeguard the rights of individuals and entities that dissent on morally sensitive or controversial procedures.”
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
The government's statistics for euthanasia in the Netherlands were released recently. They show that the number of people who took advantage of legal assisted suicide and euthanasia declined slightly -- about 7% -- for the first time since 2006.
To be completely candid, I regard a decline in the number of euthanasia cases as good news. That is, if it is true. It is possible that more cases were simply not reported to the authorities. Fewer euthanasia cases means fewer people in desperate pain and fewer people who feel that their lives are meaningless.
However, this is not the way that euthanasia supporters see it. For them it was bad news because fewer people had taken advantage of the blessing of a peaceful death. From their point of view, good news is an ever-increasing, upward-sloping line on a graph.
Euthanasia already accounts for at least 4% of all deaths in the Netherlands. What proportion are its supporters aiming at? 5%? 10%? 40%? I have never read any projections of this figure. It would be interesting to know what the future holds for the Dutch.
To be completely candid, I regard a decline in the number of euthanasia cases as good news. That is, if it is true. It is possible that more cases were simply not reported to the authorities. Fewer euthanasia cases means fewer people in desperate pain and fewer people who feel that their lives are meaningless.
However, this is not the way that euthanasia supporters see it. For them it was bad news because fewer people had taken advantage of the blessing of a peaceful death. From their point of view, good news is an ever-increasing, upward-sloping line on a graph.
Euthanasia already accounts for at least 4% of all deaths in the Netherlands. What proportion are its supporters aiming at? 5%? 10%? 40%? I have never read any projections of this figure. It would be interesting to know what the future holds for the Dutch.
 Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |  |  |  |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
A worrying sign for supporters by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
Study highlights the importance of responsible portrayal of suicide by the media by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
But attacked for “endangering lives” by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
Police and scientists want to study the decomposition of bodies by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
Robots could attain an animal level of consciousness by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
Now that euthanasia is legal in Canada, transplant opportunities arise by Michael Cook | May 05, 2019
Aggressive sales tactics are used to sell treatment BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario