Has WHO blotted its copybook by being too cosy with China?
The World Health Organization is being criticised for being too close to China, one of his major funders. Director-General Tedros Adhanom has been loud in his praise of China’s management of the epidemic and has failed (in the eyes of his critics) to point out its shortcomings.
In a blistering article in Foreign Policy, a German journalist, Hinnerk Feldwisch-Drentrup, says that “while recommending China’s epidemic control policy to the world, WHO neglected the negative externalities—from economic damage to the failure to treat many non-coronavirus patients, psychological woes, and human rights costs.”
In Rolling Stone, Steven Hoffman, director of the Global Strategy Lab, says: “In some respects, with China taking these extraordinary measures and WHO praising them, we now live in a new world when it comes to human rights in health emergencies.”
And in The Telegraph (London), science journalist Matt Ridley writes that “WHO is ‘not fit for mission’ ... [and] riddled with politics and bureaucracy.” He accuses WHO of three failures. First, it failed to prepare the world for a pandemic, focusing instead on obesity,smoking and climate change. Second, it sycophantically praised China’s response to Covid-19. And third, it failed to respond quickly and effectively to the Ebola outbreak of 2014. At its height the former director, Margaret Chan, called climate change the “defining issue of the 21st century”. In retrospect that seems like a bad call.
“WHO gives the impression it would rather reprimand rich countries for climate change or bad eating habits than worry about epidemics,” Ridley concludes sardonically.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
One of the saddest stories from the coronavirus pandemic comes from Iran. As of Friday, there had been 53,000 cases and 3,300 deaths. But, adding to the country's misery, hundreds of people have died after drinking methanol as a “remedy”. It illustrates the danger of a panicked response to the virus. Most of our other stories revolve around the crisis as well.
We'll be taking a break next week for the Easter holiday. See you later in the month.
Michael Cook
Editor, BioEdge
We'll be taking a break next week for the Easter holiday. See you later in the month.
Michael Cook
Editor, BioEdge
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
‘Our civil rights laws protect the equal dignity of every human life from ruthless utilitarianism’by Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
Bootleg methanol kills and blindsby Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
Bill passes almost unnoticed in pandemic panicby Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
‘The Lancet’ warns that draconian measures can harm the poorby | Apr 05, 2020
WHO has neglected the negative externalities of social distancingby Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
While the public is distractedby Michael Cook | Apr 05, 2020
The media shouldn’t extrapolate from a few remarksby Xavier Symons | Apr 05, 2020
Ethics is proving increasingly relevant to the coronavirus crisis.by Xavier Symons | Apr 04, 2020
Commentators say wet-markets are unethical and a danger to humanity. BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario