Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights From the High Value Healthcare Collaborative
Affiliations
- PMID: 32021114
- PMCID: PMC6954078
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S227207
Abstract
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) research has emphasized the role of decision aids (DAs) for helping patients make treatment decisions reflective of their preferences, yet there have been few collaborative multi-institutional efforts to integrate DAs in orthopedic consultations and primary care encounters.
Objective: In the context of routine DA implementation for SDM, we investigate which patient-level characteristics are associated with patient preferences for surgery versus medical management before and after exposure to DAs. We explored whether DA implementation in primary care encounters was associated with greater shifts in patients' treatment preferences after exposure to DAs compared to DA implementation in orthopedic consultations.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: 10 High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) health systems.
Study participants: A total of 495 hip and 1343 adult knee osteoarthritis patients who were exposed to DAs within HVHC systems between July 2012 to June 2015.
Results: Nearly 20% of knee patients and 17% of hip patients remained uncertain about their treatment preferences after viewing DAs. Older patients and patients with high pain levels had an increased preference for surgery. Older patients receiving DAs from three HVHC systems that transitioned DA implementation from orthopedics into primary care had lower odds of preferring surgery after DA exposure compared to older patients in seven HVHC systems that only implemented DAs for orthopedic consultations.
Conclusion: Patients' treatment preferences were largely stable over time, highlighting that DAs for SDM largely do not necessarily shift preferences. DAs and SDM processes should be targeted at older adults and patients reporting high pain levels. Initiating treatment conversations in primary versus specialty care settings may also have important implications for engagement of patients in SDM via DAs.
Keywords: collaborative learning; health systems; patient engagement; patient preferences; quality of care; shared decision making.
© 2020 Hurley et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
- Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.PMID: 27899745
- Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study).BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e024906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906.PMID: 30804032 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
- Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians.Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):636-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431961. Epub 2012 Jan 12.PMID: 22247423 Free PMC article.
- Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.PMID: 22853804 Review.
- Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):253-257. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9409-4.PMID: 28337730 Free PMC article. Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario