Compulsion is necessary to fight Covid-19: Oxford bioethicist
_640_334_c1_c_c.jpg)
Lockdown is not only a policy for containing the spread of coronavirus; it is also an experiment in compulsory health measures. So far it seems successful and accepted – great sacrifices notwithstanding – in countries with very different cultural and political backgrounds.
Governments are on a roll. So why not make contact app tracing and vaccination compulsory as well? This is the question posed by Oxford University bioethicist Alberto Giubilini, in the Practical Ethics blog.
If we accept compulsory measures when the cost is very large (lockdown), we should accept compulsory measures when the cost is vastly smaller (tracing apps and vaccination), other things being equal. The justification for compulsory measures is stronger, the less burdensome the requirements are, other things being equal.
He argues that there are three strong ethical reasons for making all three steps of fighting the virus compulsory:
First, in all the three cases, the higher the compliance, the more effective the policy at containing the spread of the virus and at minimizing the economic, psychological, and societal costs of this pandemic. Compulsion will likely make compliance higher than alternative policies…
Second, in all three cases, not complying with the requirement would be an unfair form of freeriding on the efforts of others. Freeriding on important public goods – as collective immunity is – is not only unethical, but often prohibited by the law, and rightly so….
Third, the infringements involved would be much smaller than the ones we are already accepting in the case of compulsory lockdown. The benefits, though, will be much greater.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Now that most countries are thinking of slowing lifting lockdowns and relaxing social distancing restrictions, the issue of coronavirus 'passports' is emerging as the next big ethical issue for epidemiologists. Should people get a stamp on identity cards (what identity cards?) confirming that they are 'clean'? Sounds sensible -- at first. See the articles below.
Michael Cook
Editor
Michael Cook
Editor
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
A controversial idea amongst the expertsby Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
Famous novelist takes dim view of erasure of women from baby's lifeby | May 10, 2020
There are three strong ethical reasons for making all three steps of fighting the virus compulsoryby Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
Will they withstand legal challenges?by Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
Supporters are lobbying to force nursing homes to host MAiD doctors to ply their tradeby Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
Ivy League women receive premium compensationby Xavier Symons | May 10, 2020
A new study warns of an epidemic of deaths of despair.by Michael Cook | May 10, 2020
Dr Anthony Fauci talks about his sleeping habitsIN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Xavier Symons | May 09, 2020
There seems to be an ageist and ableist prejudice implicit in the way people assess the importance of protecting older members of the population from…BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario