Ukraine begins to open borders for babies of surrogate mothers
by Michael Cook | 13 Jun 2020 |
The Biotexcom nursery / Reuters
Foreign couples who waited two months because of Covid-19 border closures are finally collecting their babies from surrogate mothers in Ukraine.
According to Ukraine's human rights ombudswoman, Lyudmila Denisova, 31 couples were united with their infant children.
After much lobbying, the Foreign Ministry allowed the commissioning couples to enter, conditional on a two-week quarantine and negative Covid-19 test. Currently, a total of 125 babies born to surrogates across Ukraine are awaiting parents from abroad.
The issue received wide attention when Biotexcom, the country's largest surrogacy operation, posted a video showing dozens of babies in an improvised nursery at a hotel for its clients.
Denisova said 88 more couples have received permits to enter the country and will arrive in the coming weeks. However, there will many more babies – perhaps as many as 1,000 – as other pregnant surrogate mothers give birth. The problem is that Ukraine is only opening its borders slowly, and to certain countries. In the meantime, the number of babies without parents is mounting.
According to the New York Times, “With permissive legislation, high-quality private maternity hospitals and an abundance of poor women, Ukraine has in recent years become the leading country providing surrogacy services to foreigners.”
Conditions must be difficult for surrogate mothers who are waiting for the parents to arrive. One of them told the NYTimes that the baby cries constantly and that the surrogacy agency is not supportive. “It was very hard,” she said. “I just want the parents to come and to take this girl away from me.”
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
It has been a tumultuous week for the world, with rallies and riots over Black Lives Matter. But also for bioethicists and medical journals. Suddenly events compelled them to acknowledge the impact of racism, conscious and unconscious, personal and systemic. Thousands of researchers and some leading scientific organizations around the globe stopped work on June 10 to protest anti-Black racism in science.
Not that this wasn't important before, but suddenly racism appeared to trump all other considerations. Below we feature excerpts from editorials in the leading science and medical journals about this astonishingly rapid shift in priorities.
Michael Cook
Editor
Not that this wasn't important before, but suddenly racism appeared to trump all other considerations. Below we feature excerpts from editorials in the leading science and medical journals about this astonishingly rapid shift in priorities.
Michael Cook
Editor
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
The pandemic has exposed the effects of ageismby Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
J.K. Rowling comes out as trans scepticby Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
In the wake of revulsion at the death of George Floyd, scientists and doctors vow to changeby Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
Name and bust of Rufus Von KleinSmid removedby Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
There could be as many as 1000 babiesby Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
But is it just a public relations stunt?by Michael Cook | Jun 13, 2020
Why are we all so polarised?IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Patrick Foong | Jun 14, 2020
Regulatory agencies need to be toughBioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario