Clinical Genetics Lacks Standard Definitions and Protocols for the Collection and Use of Diversity Measures
Affiliations
- PMID: 32504544
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.005
Abstract
Genetics researchers and clinical professionals rely on diversity measures such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) to stratify study participants and patients for a variety of applications in research and precision medicine. However, there are no comprehensive, widely accepted standards or guidelines for collecting and using such data in clinical genetics practice. Two NIH-funded research consortia, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) and Clinical Sequencing Evidence-generating Research (CSER), have partnered to address this issue and report how REA are currently collected, conceptualized, and used. Surveying clinical genetics professionals and researchers (n = 448), we found heterogeneity in the way REA are perceived, defined, and measured, with variation in the perceived importance of REA in both clinical and research settings. The majority of respondents (>55%) felt that REA are at least somewhat important for clinical variant interpretation, ordering genetic tests, and communicating results to patients. However, there was no consensus on the relevance of REA, including how each of these measures should be used in different scenarios and what information they can convey in the context of human genetics. A lack of common definitions and applications of REA across the precision medicine pipeline may contribute to inconsistencies in data collection, missing or inaccurate classifications, and misleading or inconclusive results. Thus, our findings support the need for standardization and harmonization of REA data collection and use in clinical genetics and precision health research.
Keywords: CSER; ClinGen; ancestry; clinical genetics; diversity; ethnicity; precision medicine; race; survey.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
- The clinical imperative for inclusivity: Race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) in genomics.Hum Mutat. 2018 Nov;39(11):1713-1720. doi: 10.1002/humu.23644.PMID: 30311373 Free PMC article.
- The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.PMID: 27820426
- A content analysis of the views of genetics professionals on race, ancestry, and genetics.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):222-234. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1544177. Epub 2019 Jan 4.PMID: 30608210 Free PMC article.
- Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.PMID: 26212714 Review.
- Emerging Concepts in Precision Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations.Circ Res. 2019 Jun 21;125(1):7-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314970. Epub 2019 Jun 20.PMID: 31219738 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario