GESTIÓN EN SALUD PÚBLICA: BioEdge: Should governments sweeten the vaccine pill with incentives?

domingo, 2 de agosto de 2020

BioEdge: Should governments sweeten the vaccine pill with incentives?

BioEdge: Should governments sweeten the vaccine pill with incentives?

Bioedge

Should governments sweeten the vaccine pill with incentives?

by Michael Cook | 2 Aug 2020 | 1 comment

Governments all over the world are desperate to distribute an effective vaccine for Covid-19. In May President Trump announced Operation Warp Speed – “a massive scientific, industrial, and logistical endeavor unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project” to develop a vaccine before the end of the year.

Trouble is, how do you convince enough people to get a vaccine to achieve herd immunity? Researchers differ, but some believe that as many as 82% need to be vaccinated. In the United States, a country with a strong anti-vaccination movement, this could be difficult. According to a paper in JAMA, “Recent surveys … suggest only 3 in 4 people would get vaccinated if a COVID-19 vaccine were available, and only 30% would want to receive the vaccine soon after it becomes available.”

Oxford’s Julian Savulescu has proposed a solution in the Practical Ethics blog: pay people to be vaccinated.

The advantage of payment for risk is that people are choosing voluntarily to take it on. As long as we are accurate in conveying the limitations in our confidence about the risks and benefits of a vaccine, then it is up to individuals to judge whether they are worth payment.

Indeed, if a vaccine is judged to be safe enough to be used without payment, then it is safe enough to be used with payment.

A payment model could also be superior to a mandatory model. There may be considerable resistance to a mandatory model which may make it difficult, expensive and time consuming to implement, with considerable invasion of liberty. In a payment model, people are doing what they want to do.

A payment model could also be very cheap, compared to the alternatives.

The incentive need not be in cash. People who have been vaccinated could receive special privileges, like being able to walk around without a mask or not to socially distance.

Some might object that this is shaming the non-vaccinators (some of whom might be excluded from vaccination for health reasons), just as presenting those who evaded conscription with a white feather was a method of shaming perceived free-riders. But there is a good reason to require the non-vaccinated to continue to wear masks and practice social distancing: they do represent a threat to others, a direct threat.

Savulescu concludes that a mixture of policies could be developed as an alternative to mandatory vaccination.

It is better that people voluntarily choose on the basis of reasons to act well, rather than being forced to do so. Structuring the rewards and punishments in a just and fair way is one way of giving people reasons for action.

Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge

With borders still closed around the world, news is emerging of the plight of babies born to surrogate mothers who are separated from the parents or parent who commissioned them. In George there appear to be a few dozen, in Ukraine a couple of hundred. That was bad enough. Now it appears that there may be a thousand in Russia. How many are in the United States, the premier destination for parents who want a supportive legal system and good medical care? In Albania? In Kenya? In Cyprus? We report below on what is currently known.

NEWS THIS WEEK

International surrogacy goes pear-shaped

by Michael Cook | Aug 02, 2020

A thousand babies -- at least -- are stranded in Russia with their surrogate mothers

Belgium’s euthanasia law under fire in European Court of Human Rights

by Michael Cook | Aug 02, 2020

The case of Godelieva de Troyer shows the entrenched conflict of interest in Belgian euthanasia

Of bikinis and vascular surgeons

by Michael Cook | Aug 02, 2020

What is unprofessional conduct?

North Carolina has a bit part in the dark history of genocide

by Michael Cook | Aug 02, 2020