Trump’s foetal tissue review panel is ‘stacked’, say opponents
by Michael Cook | 8 Aug 2020 |
_640_283_c1_c_c.jpg)
Human foetal tissue research has been touted as a pathway to studying the coronavirus as well as HIV, diabetes, and Parkinson’s disease. However, in the United States this is extremely controversial because of opposing views on the status of the foetus.
Earlier this year the Trump Administration established a panel to review applications to use foetal tissue. Scientists are to be funded only if there are no adequate alternatives and if acquisition and disposal of the tissue are ethical. Afterwards, the panel’s recommendations are to be studied by the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board held its first meeting on July 31. Science magazine complained that 10 of its 15 members were known to oppose abortion, including the chair, Paige Comstock Cunningham, an attorney, ethicist, and interim president of Taylor University, a Christian university in Indiana.
“The board is stacked with people who are known to oppose use of tissue from induced abortions, regardless of the scientific necessity and regardless of the fact that using such tissue does not in an y way affect whether an abortion will take place,” says R. Alta Charo, a bioethicist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
One appointee who does not oppose foetal tissue research is Lawrence Goldstein, of the University of California, San Diego. He has used foetal cells to study Alzheimer’s disease. “The fetal tissue that we’re talking about—if we don’t use it for research, it will be discarded,” Goldstein told The Scientist earlier this year. “That’s the choice. Discard the fetal tissue in the trash, or use it for valuable research.”
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
In 1978 Tom Beauchamp and James Childress published their milestone textbook, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Over at the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, they're throwing a birthday party and reviewing those legendary principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-malificence, and justice which have been the backbone of bioethics education ever since.
But it is a 40th birthday party, so perhaps it's also time for a mid-life crisis. And right on schedule arrives 'black bioethics'. Keisha Ray argues that younger and more diverse bioethicists are sick and tired of seeing their concerns about injustice and racial inequality sideliined by establishment figures. Will this lead to the crumbling of an already fractured discipline?
Michael Cook
Editor, BioEdge
But it is a 40th birthday party, so perhaps it's also time for a mid-life crisis. And right on schedule arrives 'black bioethics'. Keisha Ray argues that younger and more diverse bioethicists are sick and tired of seeing their concerns about injustice and racial inequality sideliined by establishment figures. Will this lead to the crumbling of an already fractured discipline?
Michael Cook
Editor, BioEdge
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
The field is splintering into many different factionsby Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
Transgender adults are six times more likely to be diagnosed as autisticby Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
Defying predictions, she had a happy lifeby Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
What about the equal dignity of the disabled?by Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
Combatting a crisis in medical information on the internetby Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
Ten out of 15 oppose abortionby Xavier Symons | Aug 08, 2020
Shocking footage has emerged of a father being forcibly removed from a UK ICU ward by police.IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Patrick Foong | Aug 08, 2020
American regulators get toughby Michael Cook | Aug 08, 2020
For a real epidemic, read ‘The Betrothed’BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario