Effectiveness of mandatory peer review to reduce antipsychotic prescriptions for Medicaid-insured children
Affiliations
- PMID: 32567089
- PMCID: PMC7375997
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13297
Abstract
Background: Prior authorization of prescription medications is a policy tool that can potentially impact care quality and patient safety.
Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a mandatory peer-review program in reducing antipsychotic prescriptions among Medicaid-insured children, accounting for secular trends that affected antipsychotic prescribing nationally.
Data source: Medicaid Analytical eXtracts (MAX) with administrative claims for health services provided between January 2006 and December 2011.
Study design: This retrospective, observational study examined prescription claims records from Washington State (Washington) and compared them to a synthetic control drawing from 20 potential donor states that had not implemented any antipsychotic prior authorization program or mandatory peer review for Medicaid-insured children during the study period. This method provided a means to control for secular trends by simulating the antipsychotic use trajectory that the program state would have been expected to experience in the absence of the policy implementation.
Principal findings: Before the policy implementation, antipsychotic use prevalence closely tracked those of the synthetic control (6.17 per 1000 in Washington vs. 6.21 in the synthetic control group). Within two years after the policy was implemented, prevalence decreased to 4.04 in Washington and remained stable in the synthetic control group (6.47), corresponding to an approximately 38% decline.
Conclusion: Prior authorization program designs and implementations vary widely. This mandatory peer-review program, with an authorization window and two-stage rollout, was effective in moving population level statistics toward safe and judicious use of antipsychotic medications in children.
Keywords: Medicaid; antipsychotic medications; children and adolescents; mandatory peer review; prior authorization; synthetic control method.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Similar articles
- The effects of prior authorization policies on medicaid-enrolled children's use of antipsychotic medications: evidence from two mid-Atlantic states.J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;24(7):374-81. doi: 10.1089/cap.2014.0008. Epub 2014 Aug 21.PMID: 25144909 Free PMC article.
- Cost and utilization of behavioral health medications associated with rescission of an exemption for prior authorization for severe and persistent mental illness in the Vermont Medicaid Program.J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Jun;16(5):317-28. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.317.PMID: 20518584
- The Impact of a State Medicaid Peer-Review Authorization Program on Pediatric Use of Antipsychotic Medications.Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Mar 1;69(3):293-299. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700177. Epub 2017 Nov 15.PMID: 29137557
- Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses.2014 Sep. In: VA Evidence Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011–.PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
- Evidence Brief: The Effectiveness Of Mandatory Computer-Based Trainings On Government Ethics, Workplace Harassment, Or Privacy And Information Security-Related Topics.2014 May. In: VA Evidence Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011–.PMID: 27606391 Free Books & Documents. Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario