Over-population fading as greatest moral challenge of our time
by Michael Cook | 6 Sep 2020 | 1 comment
Climate change, over-population, and a demographic winter are all competing for nomination as the Greatest Moral Challenge of Our Time. This could lead to some odd political alignments.
George Monbiot, columnist for The Guardian and an environmental activist, recently published a column, “Population panic lets rich people off the hook for the climate crisis they are fuelling”, whose sentiments are almost identical to those of Pope Francis, a man whom he once denounced as an ally of “tyrants, land grabbers, debt slavers and death squads”.
The issue du jour is over-population. A recent article in The Lancet predicted that “global population is likely to peak then crash much sooner than most scientists had assumed”. Monbiot accepts that the world is facing both an environmental and a demographic catastrophe:
Before long, this reproductive panic will disappear. Nations will soon be fighting over immigrants: not to exclude them, but to attract them, as the demographic transition leaves their ageing populations with a shrinking tax base and a dearth of key workers.
However, a generation of activists is still stuck in a time warp where Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb is about to explode. The legendary primatologist Dame Jane Goodall, for instance, appeared at Davos this year to tell the great and good that: “All these things we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.”
One sign of the times, Monbiot notes, is that a movement called BirthStrike has decided to disband. It had been created by women who wanted to call attention to the horror of environmental collapse by sacrificing their desire for children – climate change nuns, so to speak. But it was interpreted as a practical way of reducing the population by latter-day Malthusians.
Focusing on over-population, says Monbiot, is too often an excuse to continue with self-destructive excessive consumption. “If the answer to environmental crisis is to wish other people away, [they] might as well give up and carry on consuming,” he writes.
The problem with environmental degradation is not too many people; it’s too much consumption. “When affluent white people wrongly transfer the blame for their environmental impacts on to the birthrate of much poorer brown and black people, their finger-pointing reinforces these narratives. It is inherently racist.”
That seems very much like vintage Pope Francis.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
In 2017 Victoria became the first state in Australia to legalise assisted suicide and euthanasia. The government proudly declared that 68 safeguards made it the most conservative law of its kind in the world. The state's premier predicted that there would be about a dozen deaths, not too many, nothing to get your knickers in a knot about.
A report for the law's first year of operation, however, has revealed that more than 120 people died -- ten times more than expected. It doesn't seem that those brakes are working.
Michael Cook
Editor
A report for the law's first year of operation, however, has revealed that more than 120 people died -- ten times more than expected. It doesn't seem that those brakes are working.
Michael Cook
Editor
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
Statistics for first full year releasedby Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
Wife fights her husband’s request for euthanasiaby Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
“It’s kind of like a Fitbit in your skull, with tiny wires”by Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
2020 marks the centenary of the birth of Henrietta Lacksby Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
International commission side-steps ethical issuesby Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
George Monbiot says that population panic is letting rich people off the hookby Michael Cook | Sep 06, 2020
The state of Karnataka is relaxing some safeguards BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario