Trump nominates a pro-life woman to the US Supreme Court
by Michael Cook | 27 Sep 2020 | 1 comment
At the Supreme Court after the announcement of the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett / flickr / Victoria Pickering
As expected, President Trump has nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy on the US Supreme Court left by the recent death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Her nomination is unusual in many ways.
If Judge Barrett is confirmed by the Senate as the ninth Supreme Court Justice, she would be one of the youngest ever to serve – and more importantly, she can be expected to be on the court for decades, as American justices serve for life. A mother of seven, including two adopted children and one with Down syndrome, she would be the first to join the bench with school-aged children.
Trump’s selection is deeply political. A core promise to his supporters is filling the bench with conservative judges who will, amongst other things, overturn the 1973 ruling of Roe v Wade. No justice has ever been nominated so close to a presidential election and Democrats and some Republicans feel that appointing Ginsburg’s replacement should be the prerogative of the winner of November’s election. But keeping his promise might give Trump another four years in the White House.
Few pundits question the quality of Judge Barrett’s intellect. But she would be a judicial conservative replacing an outspoken liberal. Although no one can predict how justices will vote after their nomination, she describes herself as a disciple of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she worked as a clerk. “His judicial philosophy is mine, too. A judge must apply the law as written. Judges are not policymakers, and they must be resolute in setting aside any policy views they might hold.”
Although the Supreme Court rules on an almost infinite variety of cases, from fishing rights to voting rights, one issue overshadows all the others at the moment – whether Judge Barrett will vote to overturn Roe v Wade.
Judge Barrett has been described everywhere as “a devout Catholic” with pro-life views. However, her vote would not necessarily bring about a quick reversal of Roe v Wade.
In 2013, Barrett said, "I think it is very unlikely at this point that the court is going to overturn Roe, or Roe [v. as curbed by [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey. The fundamental element, that the woman has a right to choose abortion, will probably stand." It may depend on how closely she and fellow conservatives on the court will hew to the doctrine of stare decisis, of deciding cases on precedent.
The path to overturning Roe v Wade, if there is one, will involve constitutional issues which seem abstruse to the layman. In fact, Justice Ginsburg, a strong supporter of “a woman’s right to choose” was not impressed by the jurisprudence of Roe v. Wade, according to legal scholars, which was based on the implied right to privacy. She believed that a firmer basis was a right to gender equality.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Judge Amy Coney Barrett gave a gracious acceptance speech after being nominated by President Trump to the US Supreme Court. “The flag of the United States is still flying at half staff in memory of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to mark the end of a great American life,” she said. “She not only broke glass ceilings, but she smashed them. She was a woman of enormous talent and consequences and her life of public service serves as an example to us all.”
It was a moving tribute to RBG, but ACB is expected to help shift SCOTUS in a very different direction – more conservative, and above all, more sceptical of abortion. As I wrote before, bioethics is “at the very centre of this strange election”.
Michael Cook
Editor
It was a moving tribute to RBG, but ACB is expected to help shift SCOTUS in a very different direction – more conservative, and above all, more sceptical of abortion. As I wrote before, bioethics is “at the very centre of this strange election”.
Michael Cook
Editor
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
But don’t expect a quick reversal of Roe v Wade even if she is confirmedby Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
Who are the modern equivalents of Genghis Khan?by Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
The fertility rate will drop to an all-time low of 1.59 during this financial yearby Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
‘Bioethics has pushed too far in the direction of the individual,’ says scholarby Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
But is there really ‘no evidence’ that they are dangerous?by Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
We cannot leave vulnerable patients behindby Michael Cook | Sep 27, 2020
New document clarifies some points for uneasy Catholics BioEdge
L1, Unit 7, 11 Lord Street · Botany, NSW 2019 · Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario