GESTIÓN EN SALUD PÚBLICA: BioEdge: Christian hospital system in US sacks doctor over support for assisted suicide

domingo, 8 de septiembre de 2019

BioEdge: Christian hospital system in US sacks doctor over support for assisted suicide

BioEdge: Christian hospital system in US sacks doctor over support for assisted suicide

Bioedge

Christian hospital system in US sacks doctor over support for assisted suicide

by Michael Cook | 7 Sep 2019 | 4 comments

A Christian health system in Denver has set off a firestorm of controversy by firing a geriatrician who wanted to help a patient die under Colorado’s 2016 assisted suicide legislation.

Dr Barbara Morris planned to help 64-year-old Neil Mahoney, who is suffering from terminal cancer, end his life at his home. She was fired on August 26, after she and Mahoney asked a state court to declare that Centura Health’s faith-based policy violates the law that allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to dying patients who want to end their own lives.

Centura is jointly run by Catholic and Seventh-Day Adventist churches, which both object to assisted suicide.

“I was shellshocked,” Morris told Kaiser Health News. “Because of all the things I expected them to do, that was not in the playbook. Because it seemed so obvious that they can’t do it.”

But Centura officials argued that Dr Morris had violated terms of her physician’s employment agreement and “encouraged an option that she knew was morally unacceptable to her employer.”

Centura stated in a letter to her that Catholic health care providers “may never condone or participate in euthanasia or assisted suicide in any way.” These are described as “intrinsically immoral” and “intrinsically evil” in the letter. “Patients experiencing suffering that cannot be alleviated should be helped to appreciate the Christian understanding of redemptive suffering,” the letter says.

Centura told the media that it “expects all our caregivers to act in a manner consistent with our Mission and Core Values.”

“We believe the freedom of religion doctrine at the heart of the First Amendment to the US Constitution supports our policies as a Christian health-care ministry,” a spokeswoman Wendy Forbes wrote in an email. “We will vigorously defend our Constitutional rights.”

On the other hand, supporters of assisted suicide declared that religious freedom should not trump the right to die.

“What’s getting lost here is the patient, and the doctor may hold equally strong ethical and religious views as Centura,” said Kathryn Tucker, executive director of the End of Life Liberty Project. “Why should their views be overridden by the views of corporate religious medicine?”

Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge

Below is an article about a 73-year-old Indian woman who has just given birth to twin boys. This is a story which used to fly onto the front page, but is now a bit ho-hum. To stir media interest, we need to break through the next barrier. “Centenarian gives birth to twins, say Indian doctors” – now that would be newsworthy, I think. At least the first centenarian would.

The ho-hum factor may account for the fact that few questions were raised about obvious ethical issues involved in septuagenarians giving birth.

First of all, it is obviously reinforcing a sexist stereotype – that a woman is useless unless she has children. Furthermore, despite reassuring words from the doctors, it is a serious risk to the mother’s health.

Second, the children of a 73-year-old mother will soon be orphans. In fact, their father had a stroke on the day after they were born. No one seems to be thinking about their welfare and their future. They are just status symbols for their parents and the doctors.

Why did the doctors cooperate? For the money? For the fame? It strikes me as completely unethical.