Mini-brains created from stem cells
by Michael Cook | 7 Sep 2019 | 1 comment
False color image of a slice of human brain organoid from a patient with autism spectrum disorder / Alysson Muotri
Scientists have created miniature brains from induced pluripotent stem cells that developed functional neural networks. And despite being a million times smaller than human brains, they produced brain waves resembling those of preterm babies.
The study in the journal Cell Stem Cell, could help scientists better understand human brain development.
"The level of neural activity we are seeing is unprecedented in vitro," says Alysson Muotri, a biologist at the University of California, San Diego. "We are one step closer to have a model that can actually generate these early stages of a sophisticated neural network."
The pea-sized brains, called cerebral organoids, are derived from human pluripotent stem cells. By putting them in culture that mimics the environment of brain development, the stem cells differentiate into different types of brain cells and self-organize into a 3D structure resembling the developing human brain.
Scientists have successfully grown organoids with cellular structures similar to those of human brains. However, none of the previous models developed human-like functional neural networks. Networks appear when neurons are mature and become interconnected, and they are essential for most brain activities.
"You can use brain organoids for several things, including understand normal human neurodevelopment, disease modeling, brain evolution, drug screening, and even to inform artificial intelligence," Muotri says.
The team began to detect bursts of brain waves from organoids at about two months. The signals were sparse and had the same frequency, a pattern seen in very immature human brains. As the organoids continued to grow, they produced brain waves at different frequencies, and the signals appeared more regularly. This suggests the organoids have further developed their neural networks.
However, it's not likely these organoids have mental activities, such as consciousness, Muotri says. "The organoid is still a very rudimentary model -- we don't have other brain parts and structures. So these brain waves might not have anything to do with activities in real brains."
"It might be that in the future, we will get something that is really close to the signals in the human brains that control behaviors, thoughts, or memory," Muotri says. "But I don't think we have any evidence right now to say we have any of those."
"As a scientist, I want to get closer and closer to the human brain," Muotri says. "I want to do that because I see the good in it. I can help people with neurological conditions by giving them better treatments and better quality of life. But it's up to us to decide where the limit is. It might be that the technology is not ready yet, or we don't know how to control the technology. This is the same kind of discussion around CRISPR in babies, and that's why we have ethics committees to represent all parts of the society."
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Below is an article about a 73-year-old Indian woman who has just given birth to twin boys. This is a story which used to fly onto the front page, but is now a bit ho-hum. To stir media interest, we need to break through the next barrier. “Centenarian gives birth to twins, say Indian doctors” – now that would be newsworthy, I think. At least the first centenarian would.
The ho-hum factor may account for the fact that few questions were raised about obvious ethical issues involved in septuagenarians giving birth.
First of all, it is obviously reinforcing a sexist stereotype – that a woman is useless unless she has children. Furthermore, despite reassuring words from the doctors, it is a serious risk to the mother’s health.
Second, the children of a 73-year-old mother will soon be orphans. In fact, their father had a stroke on the day after they were born. No one seems to be thinking about their welfare and their future. They are just status symbols for their parents and the doctors.
Why did the doctors cooperate? For the money? For the fame? It strikes me as completely unethical.
The ho-hum factor may account for the fact that few questions were raised about obvious ethical issues involved in septuagenarians giving birth.
First of all, it is obviously reinforcing a sexist stereotype – that a woman is useless unless she has children. Furthermore, despite reassuring words from the doctors, it is a serious risk to the mother’s health.
Second, the children of a 73-year-old mother will soon be orphans. In fact, their father had a stroke on the day after they were born. No one seems to be thinking about their welfare and their future. They are just status symbols for their parents and the doctors.
Why did the doctors cooperate? For the money? For the fame? It strikes me as completely unethical.
Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Sep 07, 2019
Conflict set up between freedom of speech and freedom of religionby Michael Cook | Sep 07, 2019
Their brain waves resemble pre-term babiesby Michael Cook | Sep 07, 2019
“The happiest time of my life,” says her husbandby Michael Cook | Sep 07, 2019
Bernie Sanders stirs up a hornets’ nestIN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Bruce P. Blackshaw and Daniel Rodger | Sep 08, 2019
Why not make clinically indicated procedures the benchmark?BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario