lunes, 12 de mayo de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Lessons Learned in Community Research Through The Native Proverbs 31 Health Project - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Lessons Learned in Community Research Through The Native Proverbs 31 Health Project - CDC

PCD Logo

Lessons Learned in Community Research Through The Native Proverbs 31 Health Project

Caroline M. Kimes, BSPH; Shannon L. Golden, MA; Rhonda F. Maynor; John G. Spangler, MD, MPH; Ronny A. Bell, PhD, MS

Suggested citation for this article: Kimes CM, Golden SL, Maynor RF, Spangler JG, Bell RA. Lessons Learned in Community Research Through The Native Proverbs 31 Health Project. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130256. DOI: Web Site Icon.


American Indian women have high rates of cardiovascular disease largely because of their high prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. This population has high rates of cardiovascular disease-related behaviors, including physical inactivity, harmful tobacco use, and a diet that promotes heart disease. Culturally appropriate interventions are needed to establish health behavior change to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.
Community Context
This study was conducted in Robeson County, North Carolina, the traditional homeland of the Lumbee Indian tribe. The study’s goal was to develop, deliver, and evaluate a community-based, culturally appropriate cardiovascular disease program for American Indian women and girls.
Formative research, including focus groups, church assessments, and literature reviews, were conducted for intervention development. Weekly classes during a 4-month period in 4 Lumbee churches (64 women and 11 girls in 2 primary intervention churches; 82 women and 8 girls in 2 delayed intervention churches) were led by community lay health educators. Topics included nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco use cessation and were coupled with messages from the Proverbs 31 passage, which describes the virtuous, godly woman. Surveys collected at the beginning and end of the program measured programmatic effects and change in body mass index.
Churches were very receptive to the program. However, limitations included slow rise in attendance, scheduling conflicts for individuals and church calendars, and resistance to change in cultural traditions.

Churches are resources in developing and implementing health promotion programs in Christian populations. Through church partnerships, interventions can be tailored to suit the needs of targeted groups.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Ronny A. Bell, PhD, MS, Maya Angelou Center for Health Equity, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. Telephone: 336-713-7611. E-mail:
Author Affiliations: Caroline M. Kimes, Shannon L. Golden, Rhonda F. Maynor, John G. Spangler, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.


  1. Galloway JM. Cardiovascular health among American Indians and Alaska Natives: successes, challenges, and potentials. Am J Prev Med 2005;29(5, Suppl 1):11–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Kurian AK, Cardarelli KM. Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn Dis 2007;17(1):143–52.PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Kaler SN, Ralph-Campbell K, Pohar S, King M, Laboucan CR, Toth EL. High rates of the metabolic syndrome in a First Nations community in western Canada: prevalence and determinants in adults and children. Int J Circumpolar Health 2006;65(5):389–402. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disparities in premature deaths from heart disease — 50 states and the District of Columbia, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(6):121–5. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. North Carolina Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities and State Center for Health Statistics. Racial and ethnic health disparities in North Carolina: report card 2010. Raleigh (NC): North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
  6. Howard BV, Lee ET, Cowan LD, Devereux RB, Galloway JM, Go OT, et al. Rising tide of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation 1999;99(18):2389–95. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Resnick HE; Strong Heart Study Investigators. Metabolic syndrome in American Indians. Diabetes Care 2002;25(7):1246–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Struthers R, Baker M, Savik K. Cardiovascular risk factors among Native American women Inter-Tribal Heart Project participants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006;35(4):482–90. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Jobe JB, Adams AK, Henderson JA, Karanja N, Lee ET, Walters KL. Community-responsive interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk in American Indians. J Prim Prev 2012;33(4):153–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Vaid I, Wigington C, Borbely D, Ferry P, Manheim D. WISEWOMAN: addressing the needs of women at high risk for cardiovascular disease. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20(7):977–82. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Who are the Lumbee? Pembroke (NC): Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina; 2012. Accessed June 24, 2013.
  12. Bell RA, Shaw HA, Dignan MB. Dietary intake of Lumbee Indian women in Robeson County, North Carolina. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95(12):1426–8.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Spangler JG, Bell RA, Knick S, Michielutte R, Dignan MB, Summerson JH. Epidemiology of tobacco use among Lumbee Indians in North Carolina. J Cancer Educ 1999;14(1):34–40. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Levin S, Welch VL, Bell RA, Casper ML. Geographic variation in cardiovascular disease risk factors among American Indians and comparisons with the corresponding state populations. Ethn Health 2002;7(1):57–67. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Stilling GES. Lumbee Indians. In: Powell WS, editor. Encyclopedia of North Carolina. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press; 2006. p. 699–703.
  16. Tussing-Humphreys L, Thomson JL, Mayo T, Edmond E. A church-based diet and physical activity intervention for rural, lower Mississippi Delta African American adults: Delta Body and Soul effectiveness study, 2010–2011. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E92. Accessed June 24, 2013. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. DeHaven MJ, Hunter IB, Wilder L, Walton JW, Berry J. Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? Am J Public Health 2004;94(6):1030–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Campbell MK, Hudson MA, Resnicow K, Blakeney N, Paxton A, Baskin M. Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annu Rev Public Health 2007;28:213–34. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Yanek LR, Becker DM, Moy TF, Gittelsohn J, Koffman DM. Project Joy: faith-based cardiovascular health promotion for African American women. Public Health Rep 2001;116(Suppl 1):68–81. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Resnicow K, Campbell M, Carr C, McCarty F, Wang T, Periasamy S, et al. Body and Soul: a dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. Am J Prev Med 2004;27(2):97–105. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: