lunes, 12 de mayo de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Prevalence of Cigarette Advertising and Other Promotional Strategies at the Point of Sale in St Louis, Missouri: Analysis by Store Type and Distance From a School - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Prevalence of Cigarette Advertising and Other Promotional Strategies at the Point of Sale in St Louis, Missouri: Analysis by Store Type and Distance From a School - CDC



PCD Logo



Prevalence of Cigarette Advertising and Other Promotional Strategies at the Point of Sale in St Louis, Missouri: Analysis by Store Type and Distance From a School

Joaquin Barnoya, MD, MPH; Graham Colditz, MD, DrPH; Sarah Moreland-Russell, PhD, MPH; Julianne Cyr, MPH; Doneisha Snider; Mario Schootman, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Barnoya J, Colditz G, Moreland-Russell S, Cyr J, Snider D, Schootman M. Prevalence of Cigarette Advertising and Other Promotional Strategies at the Point of Sale in St Louis, Missouri: Analysis by Store Type and Distance From a School. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:130150. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130150External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Point-of-sale advertising provides an opportunity for the tobacco industry to communicate with current and potential smokers. The US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act allows states to implement policies requiring that tobacco products be placed out of sight, and the Food and Drug Administration is considering banning point-of-sale advertising within 1,000 feet of schools. Our objective was to compare cigarette point-of-sale advertising near schools with grades prekindergarten through 12 and by store type.
Methods
All registered cigarette retailers (n = 1,229) and schools (n = 581) in the city of St Louis and St Louis County were geocoded and mapped by using ArcGIS. Retailers were divided into 2 groups, those within 1,000 feet and those within 1,001 to 2,000 feet of a school; 200 retailers from each group were randomly selected. We assessed tobacco interior and exterior advertising, brands advertised, discounts, gifts with purchase, “no sales to minors” signage, and cigarette functional items (eg, advertising on shopping baskets). Analyses were done by distance from a school and store type.
Results
We analyzed 340 retailers. Most retailers within 1,000 feet (91.2%) and from 1,001 to 2,000 feet (94.2%) of a school displayed cigarette advertising (P = .20). Convenience stores had the highest number of interior ads. In multivariable models, distance from school explained 0.2% of the variance in total advertising.
Conclusion
Cigarette point-of-sale advertising is highly prevalent in St Louis within 1,000 feet of schools. A ban based on distance from a school might decrease advertising exposure, but its effect on smoking prevalence is yet to be determined because advertising farther from schools would still prevail.


Author Information

Corresponding Author: Joaquin Barnoya, MD, MPH, Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 6100, St Louis, MO 63110. Telephone: 314-454-7940. E-mail: barnoyaj@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Authors Affiliations: Graham Colditz, Sarah Moreland-Russell, Julianne Cyr, Doneisha Snider, Mario Schootman, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

References



  1. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA. A historical analysis of tobacco marketing and the uptake of smoking by youth in the United States: 1890–1977. Health Psychol 1995;14(6):500–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Pollay RW. More than meets the eye: on the importance of retail cigarette merchandising. Tob Control 2007;16(4):270–4. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission cigarette report for 2009 and 2010. http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/09/120921cigarettereport.pdf. Accessed November 2, 2013.
  4. Paynter J, Edwards R. The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11(1):25–35. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012.
  6. Gilpin EA, White MM, Messer K, Pierce JP. Receptivity to tobacco advertising and promotions among young adolescents as a predictor of established smoking in young adulthood. Am J Public Health 2007;97(8):1489–95. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Henriksen L, Schleicher NC, Feighery EC, Fortmann SP. A longitudinal study of exposure to retail cigarette advertising and smoking initiation. Pediatrics 2010;126(2):232–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Slater SJ, Chaloupka FJ, Wakefield M, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The impact of retail cigarette marketing practices on youth smoking uptake. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161(5):440–5. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Pub. L. No. 111-31 [H.R. 1256] (June 22, 2009).
  10. Luke DA, Ribisl KM, Smith C, Sorg AA. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(3):295–302. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco control state highlights, 2010. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.
  12. McDonald NC. Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969–2001. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(6):509–16. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Boscoe FP, Henry KA, Zdeb MS. A nationwide comparison of driving distance versus straight-line distance to hospitals. Prof Geogr 2012;64(2):188–96. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. US Department of Health and Human Services. Request for comment on implementation of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010, p. 13241–3.
  15. Clattenburg EJ, Elf JL, Apelberg BJ. Unplanned cigarette purchases and tobacco point of sale advertising: a potential barrier to smoking cessation. Tob Control 2013;22(6):376–81. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Feighery EC, Ribisl KM, Schleicher N, Lee RE, Halvorson S. Cigarette advertising and promotional strategies in retail outlets: results of a statewide survey in California. Tob Control 2001;10(2):184–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Points-of-purchase tobacco environments and variation by store type — United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51(9):184–7. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Barnoya J, Mejia R, Szeinman D, Kummerfeldt CE. Tobacco point-of-sale advertising in Guatemala City, Guatemala and Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tob Control 2010;19(4):338–41. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. British Broadcasting Corporation. Tobacco display ban in large shops comes into force, 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-22332048. Accessed October 24, 2013.
  20. Henriksen L. Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place. Tob Control 2012;21(2):147–53. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Fielding R, Chee YY, Choi KM, Chu TK, Kato K, Lam SK, et al. Declines in tobacco brand recognition and ever-smoking rates among young children following restrictions on tobacco advertisements in Hong Kong. J Public Health (Oxf) 2004;26(1):24–30. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, Henriksen L. An experimental study of effects on schoolchildren of exposure to point-of-sale cigarette advertising and pack displays. Health Educ Res 2006;21(3):338–47. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  23. Wakefield M, Germain D, Henriksen L. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase. Addiction 2008;103(2):322–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Donovan RJ, Jancey J, Jones S. Tobacco point of sale advertising increases positive brand user imagery. Tob Control 2002;11(3):191–4. CrossRefExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Haladjian HH, Fortmann SP. Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tob Control 2004;13(3):315–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  26. Chaloupka FJ, Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK. Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl 1):I62–72. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. White VM, White MM, Freeman K, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Cigarette promotional offers: who takes advantage? Am J Prev Med 2006;30(3):225–31.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  28. World Health Organization. WHO framework convention on tobacco control: guidelines for implementation. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization, 2011.
  29. Widome R, Brock B, Noble P, Forster JL. The relationship of neighborhood demographic characteristics to point-of-sale tobacco advertising and marketing. Ethn Health 2013;18(2):136–51. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  30. Yu D, Peterson NA, Sheffer MA, Reid RJ, Schnieder JE. Tobacco outlet density and demographics: analysing the relationships with a spatial regression approach. Public Health 2010;124(7):412–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: