Australia launches inquiry into safety and ethics of transgender medicine
by Michael Cook | 18 Aug 2019 |
A national inquiry into the safety and ethics of transgender medicine will be conducted by the Royal Australasian College of Physicians with the backing of Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt.
At the moment there are no nationally agreed standards, although guidelines issued by Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital gender clinic have been referred to as the “Australian standards”. However, this document, which has been described as the “most progressive” in the world by Victoria’s Minister for Health, has not been approved by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
The RCH model commits doctors to the controversial policy of reducing“mental illness in trans and gender diverse children by affirming and protecting their identity in a world where many judge and hurt them”.
According to an exclusive article in The Australian about the inquiry, “Critics say the 2018 standards encourage risky medical treatment without properly considering safer therapies such as counselling for problems such as depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder, bullying and family conflict. The RCH standards overplay evidence for medical treatment and downplay risks, say ‘dissident’ clinicians.”
The opposing sides of the debate over transgender Australian youth differ on fundamental issues.
Michelle Telfer, director of the Royal Children’s Hospital Gender Service in Melbourne, told The Australian that commencing medical intervention as young as 13 or 14 was “not at all controversial within those with expertise because we all know that we have been doing this for years”.
Critics question whether gender dysphoria is really understood.
“Far be it from anybody to say that there are absolutely no people in the world who are genuinely gender dysphoric and who find it impossible to live in their biological sex,” said Dr Dianna Kenny, a psychologist. “What I’m saying is it’s been massively and irresponsibly over-diagnosed … (these children and teens) are going to be irrevocably damaged by the treatment they received.”
And the ethics of irreversible medical treatment have not been settled. “Who gave ethics approval for this treatment (at children’s hospitals) when it lacks any scientific basis and therefore is an experiment?” asks Prof John Whitehall, of Western Sydney University. “We should give the psychiatry and psychology a full run before we start castrating children.”
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Sorry, guys. We're running a bit late with this week's newsletter. I'd love to get your comments on our two lead stories on transgender treatment ethics and on the fertility industry.
Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
Clash of convictions by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
The Economist analyses the market by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
Helps to solve sperm shortage, say clinics by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
Free Democrats release position paper on liberalising fertility treatment by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
A bioethical Gresham’s Law by Michael Cook | Aug 18, 2019
High reading levels needed by Xavier Symons | Aug 18, 2019
AJOB explores the negative implications of altering the human genome.by Michael Cook | Aug 17, 2019
A very helpful list of the leading bioethics journals. BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario