Inquiry into NHS blood scandal begins
by Xavier Symons | 30 Sep 2018 |
A public inquiry has begun in the UK into the use of contaminated blood for patients with haemophilia and other bleeding disorders, after revelations that approximately 5000 patients were infected with HIV and hepatitis viruses from the 1970s to 1990s.
The enquiry comes after decades of campaigning from victims of contaminated blood transfusions and allegations of widespread cover-up by politicians and NHS officials.
In 1970s, new blood clotting products -- Factor VIII and less commonly, Factor IX -- were introduced in the UK and proclaimed as “wonder drugs” that would not only save lives but also enable haemophiliacs to lead normal lives. Yet the products were made from the pooled plasma from tens of thousands of donors, some of which was contaminated. Blood was being imported from overseas as a result of domestic shortage, and some of the blood products were from prison inmates and others carrying deadly viruses. It was only in the mid-1980s that the products started to be heat-treated to kill pathogens.
Sixty-one-year-old Steve Dymond, who received contaminated blood injection in the mid 1980s, said he had been "betrayed and lied to" by government, health professionals and drug companies trying to avoid responsibility.
Those leading the inquiry pledged to investigate claims of a cover up thorough and hold anyone found to be responsible to account "without fear of favour".
Previous inquiries have lacked powers to be able to force witnesses to come and give evidence, undermining their ability to establish whether the risks were known about but concealed from patients and previous investigations. Jenni Richards QC, counsel to the inquiry, said she expected the inquiry to last about 15 months once it starts taking evidence in April next year. It is likely to involve the questioning of former government ministers, she said.
Monday, October 1, 2018
It has been a dreadful weekend. On Saturday Collingwood lost the AFL Grand Final to the West Coast Eagles – in the last five minutes. It has taken me a while to get over this. On the brighter side, today the Roosters beat Melbourne Storm convincingly, 21-6, in the Rugby League Grand Final in Sydney. I just thought that our international readers might like to keep in touch with the world’s greatest sports.
These contests are a testimony to the strength and fitness of the athletes. It’s incredible that they can even walk after being buried beneath a mound of other bodies and sustaining a few quiet kicks to the ribs. But they rise, shake themselves and start sprinting around the paddock, begging for more punishment.
In an interesting analysis of American football below (the kind in which they wear helmets and shoulder pads and take four hours to complete a 60-minute game), two kinesiologists ask whether the sport should be considered unethical in the light of the significant injuries sustained by many players.
It’s a problem with all sports, including rugby league and AFL. Basketballers have terrible ankles; rugby union players have become quadriplegics; cricketers have died. They conclude: “Considering all the morally problematic aspects surrounding football, it is worth asking: Is this the kind of social practice around which Americans should imagine and build their national identity?”
What do you think? Should the threat of severe injury be enough to ban a sport? What level of harm is acceptable?
As for myself, I’m playing it safe. I’m sticking with my preferred sport, full-contact origami.
These contests are a testimony to the strength and fitness of the athletes. It’s incredible that they can even walk after being buried beneath a mound of other bodies and sustaining a few quiet kicks to the ribs. But they rise, shake themselves and start sprinting around the paddock, begging for more punishment.
In an interesting analysis of American football below (the kind in which they wear helmets and shoulder pads and take four hours to complete a 60-minute game), two kinesiologists ask whether the sport should be considered unethical in the light of the significant injuries sustained by many players.
It’s a problem with all sports, including rugby league and AFL. Basketballers have terrible ankles; rugby union players have become quadriplegics; cricketers have died. They conclude: “Considering all the morally problematic aspects surrounding football, it is worth asking: Is this the kind of social practice around which Americans should imagine and build their national identity?”
What do you think? Should the threat of severe injury be enough to ban a sport? What level of harm is acceptable?
As for myself, I’m playing it safe. I’m sticking with my preferred sport, full-contact origami.
 Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |  |  |  |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2018
Have you ever considered a black market in uteruses?by Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2018
What if the publication of research could be dangerous?by Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2018
Only public-reason-based arguments cut the mustardby Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2018
A public inquiry has begun into the use of contaminated blood for patients with bleeding disorders.by Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2018
HHS is conducting an audit of all acquisitions involving human fetal tissue.by Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2018
The Indian government will be restricted in its use of the system's databy Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2018
The report recommends palliative sedation as a legal alternative.IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Cesar R. Torres and Francisco Javier López Frías | Sep 29, 2018
It is not inherent violence but a culture of violence around the sport that is troublingBioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario