jueves, 17 de octubre de 2019

Q&A: Term limits to diversify medical school leadership

Morning Rounds
Shraddha Chakradhar

Q&A: Term limits to diversify medical school leadership

Some 18% of U.S. medical school deans are women, and 12% are from other underrepresented minorities. Doctors writing in a new NEJM perspective argue setting term limits is one way to rectify these gaps. I spoke with Dr. Reshma Jagsi, a radiation oncologist at Michigan Medicine and senior author of the paper, to learn more.

Is there an ideal limit? 
The NIH proposed 12-year limits for some of its leadership, but I don’t know if that’s the magic number. There are many institutions that have their own terms built in, like five-year renewable terms. Maybe you have a norm of two five-year terms, and for really good service, you allow a third five-year term. But something shy of 43 [which is one term observed in study] is probably what we want.

Could term limits have other effects?
There are other benefits: A woman may not think that a 70-kilogram white male is the anatomic norm and a smaller black woman is a deviation from the norm. [Diversity in leadership] might actually ensure that there are adequate numbers of clinical trial participants who are women and minorities.

Read the full interview here

No hay comentarios: