domingo, 22 de marzo de 2020

BioEdge: Coronavirus forces closure of Dutch euthanasia clinic

BioEdge: Coronavirus forces closure of Dutch euthanasia clinic

Bioedge

Coronavirus forces closure of Dutch euthanasia clinic
    
The only specialised euthanasia clinic in the Netherlands has closed its doors during the coronavirus pandemic. The Euthanasia Expertise Center, formerly known as the End of Life Clinic (Levenseindekliniek), is located in The Hague and provides counselling and euthanasia services for patients whose GPs refuse to authorise euthanasia.
According to its website, “In the interest of public health, our patients, their loved ones and employees of the expertise center, it is no longer responsible to continue our current care provision.”
No new patients will be admitted and care for current patients has been suspended. If a euthanasia has already been organised, it will proceed, provided that “the group of attendees is limited to those who are absolutely necessary”.
It is difficult to admit, says the Center, but “euthanasia care is not a top priority in health care. The risk of infection is high and the expertise centre employs ambulatory doctors and nurses who also work elsewhere.” Restrictions will continue until April 6.
Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge
Bioedge

One of the guidelines of the UK’s Nuffield Council on Bioethics about the coronavirus pandemic (see below) is that “Liberty-infringing measures to control disease, such as quarantine and isolation, can be justified if the risk of harm to others can be significantly reduced.”

I agree, but I am still surprised at how few questions have been raised about the draconian restrictions on civil liberties prompted by the crisis. These are sure to lead to recession, soaring unemployment, bankruptcies, and social dislocation. They are the harshest that I have ever experienced in my lifetime – and, with few exceptions, there’s been nary a peep of opposition. In fact, my impression is that op-ed pages segued smoothly from anger at government overreach to anger at government underreach in a month.

How long can lockdowns be sustained? As the Wall Street Journal points out, “no society can safeguard public health for long at the cost of its overall economic health.” I don't think that it is utilitarian to observe that deferring or suppressing discussion of the costs, financial and social, of our response to the coronavirus could backfire. Human dignity is paramount; acting ethically is essential. But good ethics is based on a knowledge of all the facts -- and not just the facts about hand-washing.

 
m.png
Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
 Comment on BioedgeFind Us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Xavier Symons | Mar 21, 2020
Prison populations are at great risk from the outbreak.
 
 
by Carolyn Moynihan | Mar 21, 2020
Permits abortion of the disabled and abortion for sex selection
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 21, 2020
It’s an ill wind that blows nobody good
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 21, 2020
More elderly might die
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 21, 2020
A very useful document for policy-makers
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 21, 2020
Euthanasia care is not a top priority in health care
 
 
by Xavier Symons | Mar 21, 2020
Staying at home can be ethically complicated.
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 21, 2020
“The incarnation of gender violence in its most painful form,” says a judge
 
 
by Michael Cook | Mar 18, 2020
Inspired by the adventures of a South Korean spy    
Bioedge

BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: