Is China still harvesting organs from prisoners?
by Michael Cook | 7 Mar 2020 |
In many ways China’s response to the coronavirus epidemic has been impressive. According to Science, hospitals overflowing with patients a few weeks ago now have empty beds. “China has rolled out perhaps the most ambitious, agile, and aggressive disease containment effort in history,” a World Health Organization report says.
A moving article in the Wall Street Journal relates stories of heroic doctors who are almost literally working themselves to death to care for their patients.
However, the crisis may have also opened a crack revealing a dark side to Chinese medicine.
The government’s newspaper Global Times recently reported that “a Chinese medical team successfully carried out the world's first double-lung transplant” for a coronavirus patient.
“The patient, 59, was confirmed to be infected with the coronavirus on January 26. After endotracheal intubation, ECMO (extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation) treatment and pharmacotherapy, the patient repeatedly tested negative, but his lung functions were severely impaired and suffered irreversible damage. The transplanted lungs were donated by a non-local patient after brain death and transported to Wuxi by high-speed railway in seven hours.”
But how, critics of the government have asked, were doctors able to find a brain-dead donor so quickly? “Whilst around the world waiting times for a single lung from a suitable donor could be years, China has shown this week that it need only be days, for two perfectly matched lungs to be rustled up,” says Ruth Ingram in Bitter Winter, a news service about religious persecution in China.
An extensive report on forced organ harvesting in China was released last week in London which claimed that organs can be sourced quickly because they may be taken from donors held for religious reasons and executed on demand. “Misgivings as to the origin and provenance of the organs are perfectly illustrated by the five-hour procedure on the coronavirus procedure carried out at breakneck speed from diagnosis to surgical intervention,” says Ingram.
The evidence in the report, written by the Independent Tribunal into Forced Organ Harvesting from Prisoners of Conscience in China, is not incontrovertible, but the accumulation of allegations is disturbing. “We take these allegations seriously; evidence presented at the tribunal raised disturbing details of the treatment of Falun Gong practitioners, and highlighted the lack of transparency in the Chinese organ transplant system,” says the UK Minister of State for the Commonwealth and the United Nations, Tariq Mahmood Ahmad.
As Ingram notes: “Serious questions, not adulation, should be asked about future operating room heroics, particularly when they involve further double lung transplants at short notice.”
Michael Cook is the editor of BioEdge
Milan is in the grip of an epidemic. Towns have been quarantined. Public gatherings have been cancelled. The streets are empty. Incompetent public officials are trying to dampen mounting hysteria. Dark rumours are circulating. Hospital wards are overflowing.
The coronavirus?
No, the Great Plague of 1630 in which perhaps a million (1,000,000) people died. About two hundred and fifty (250) have died so far in Italy’s coronavirus outbreak. That figure alone should immunise you against nostalgia for the Good Old Days. The panic and suffering of the citizens of Milan during the bubonic plague -- who also had to cope with a drought, a famine and the Thirty Years’ War -- make coronavirus seem like a Sunday summer picnic.
There’s a dearth of good news about the panic, illness, death and economic disruption of the world’s coronavirus epidemic. The only positive I can think of is that it may send people back to the Great Italian Novel, I Promessi Sposi (The Betrothed), which was published by Alessandro Manzoni in 1827. The climax of its complicated plot is a vivid description of the Great Plague.
If you want to be thankful for dodging a bullet by being born 400 years later than the events he described, dive into Chapters 31, 32 and 33. There are a number of instructive parallels with current events.
The coronavirus?
No, the Great Plague of 1630 in which perhaps a million (1,000,000) people died. About two hundred and fifty (250) have died so far in Italy’s coronavirus outbreak. That figure alone should immunise you against nostalgia for the Good Old Days. The panic and suffering of the citizens of Milan during the bubonic plague -- who also had to cope with a drought, a famine and the Thirty Years’ War -- make coronavirus seem like a Sunday summer picnic.
There’s a dearth of good news about the panic, illness, death and economic disruption of the world’s coronavirus epidemic. The only positive I can think of is that it may send people back to the Great Italian Novel, I Promessi Sposi (The Betrothed), which was published by Alessandro Manzoni in 1827. The climax of its complicated plot is a vivid description of the Great Plague.
If you want to be thankful for dodging a bullet by being born 400 years later than the events he described, dive into Chapters 31, 32 and 33. There are a number of instructive parallels with current events.
Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
Five years before the next reviewby Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
If not, where do the organ donors come from?by Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
There’s not much evidence but there’s no need to know much moreby Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
Should children be informed if a parent has Huntington’s Disease?by Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
Healthcare providers routinely report pregnant patients being shackled despite state prohibitions.by Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
Others say that numerous non-controversial alternatives existby Michael Cook | Mar 07, 2020
It’s associated with early death, dementia, and heart disease BioEdge
Level 1, 488 Botany Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario