Continuing Patient Care During Electronic Health Record Downtime

Ethan Larsen 1, Daniel Hoffman 2, Carlos Rivera 3, Brian M Kleiner 4, Christian Wernz 3, Raj M Ratwani 2 5

Affiliations

PMID: 31291677
PMCID: PMC6620179 (available on 2020-05-01)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692678

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic health record (EHR) downtime is any period during which the EHR system is fully or partially unavailable. These periods are operationally disruptive and pose risks to patients. EHR downtime has not sufficiently been studied in the literature, and most hospitals are not adequately prepared.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the operational implications of downtime with a focus on the clinical laboratory, and to derive recommendations for improved downtime contingency planning.

Methods: A hybrid qualitative-quantitative study based on historic performance data and semistructured interviews was performed at two mid-Atlantic hospitals. In the quantitative analysis, paper records from downtime events were analyzed and compared with normal operations. To enrich this quantitative analysis, interviews were conducted with 17 hospital employees, who had experienced several downtime events, including a hospital-wide EHR shutdown.

Results: During downtime, laboratory testing results were delayed by an average of 62% compared with normal operation. However, the archival data were incomplete due to inconsistencies in the downtime paper records. The qualitative interview data confirmed that delays in laboratory result reporting are significant, and further uncovered that the delays are often due to improper procedural execution, and incomplete or incorrect documentation. Interviewees provided a variety of perspectives on the operational implications of downtime, and how to best address them. Based on these insights, recommendations for improved downtime contingency planning were derived, which provide a foundation to enhance Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience guides.

Conclusion: This study documents the extent to which downtime events are disruptive to hospital operations. It further highlights the challenge of quantitatively assessing the implication of downtimes events, due to a lack of otherwise EHR-recorded data. Organizations that seek to improve and evaluate their downtime contingency plans need to find more effective methods to collect data during these times.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Conflict of interest statement

E.L. reports grants from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, during the conduct of the study. None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.