Implementation of a Clostridioides Difficile Prevention Bundle: Understanding Common, Unique, and Conflicting Work System Barriers and Facilitators for Subprocess Design
Affiliations
- PMID: 31190669
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.150
Abstract
Objective: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) poses a major challenge to the healthcare system. We assessed factors that should be considered when designing subprocesses of a C. difficile infection (CDI) prevention bundle.
Design: Phenomenological qualitative study.
Methods: We conducted 3 focus groups of environmental services (EVS) staff, physicians, and nurses to assess their perspectives on a CDI prevention bundle. We used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to examine 5 subprocesses of the CDI bundle: diagnostic testing, empiric isolation, contact isolation, hand hygiene, and environmental disinfection. We coded transcripts to the 5 SEIPS elements and ensured scientific rigor. We sought to determine common, unique, and conflicting factors across stakeholder groups and subprocesses of the CDI bundle.
Results: Each focus group lasted 1.5 hours on average. Common work-system barriers included inconsistencies in knowledge and practice of CDI management procedures; increased workload; poor setup of aspects of the physical environment (eg, inconvenient location of sinks); and inconsistencies in CDI documentation. Unique barriers and facilitators were related to specific activities performed by the stakeholder group. For instance, algorithmic approaches used by physicians facilitated timely diagnosis of CDI. Conflicting barriers or facilitators were related to opposing objectives; for example, clinicians needed rapid placement of a patient in a room while EVS staff needed time to disinfect the room.
Conclusions: A systems engineering approach can help to holistically identify factors that influence successful implementation of subprocesses of infection prevention bundles.
Similar articles
- Barriers and Facilitators to Clostridium Difficile Infection Prevention: A Nursing PerspectiveC Ngam et al. Am J Infect Control 45 (12), 1363-1368. PMID 28939012.The SEIPS systems engineering framework is useful to evaluate infection prevention practices for CDI and identify opportunities for improvement. Addressing the work syste …
- A Qualitative, Interprofessional Analysis of Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Clostridium Difficile Prevention Bundle Using a Human Factors Engineering ApproachE Yanke et al. Am J Infect Control 46 (3), 276-284. PMID 29269166.Interprofessional perspectives are needed to identify barriers to and facilitators of bundle implementation, which is a necessary first step to address adherence to bundl …
- "The Invisible Staff": A Qualitative Analysis of Environmental Service Workers' Perceptions of the VA Clostridium Difficile Prevention Bundle Using a Human Factors Engineering ApproachE Yanke et al. J Patient Saf. PMID 29894437.Multiple work system components serve as barriers to and facilitators of ESW adherence to the nationally mandated Department of Veterans Affairs CDI bundle. Environmental …
- Reducing Clostridium Difficile in the Inpatient Setting: A Systematic Review of the Adherence to and Effectiveness of C. Difficile Prevention BundlesAK Barker et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38 (6), 639-650. PMID 28343455. - ReviewBACKGROUND Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common infectious cause of nosocomial diarrhea, and its prevention is an urgent public health priority. Howev …
- Prevention of Endemic Healthcare-Associated Clostridium Difficile Infection: Reviewing the EvidenceJ Hsu et al. Am J Gastroenterol 105 (11), 2327-39; quiz 2340. PMID 20606676. - ReviewAntimicrobial stewardship, glove use, hand hygiene, and disposable thermometers should be routinely used for the prevention of CDI. Environmental disinfection and probiot …
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario