AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.

Kelly MP1, Noyes J2, Kane RL3, Chang C4, Uhl S5, Robinson KA6, Springs S7, Butler ME8, Guise JM9.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature.

RATIONALE:

This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.

DISCUSSION:

Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.