Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. | AHRQ Patient Safety Network

Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. | AHRQ Patient Safety Network

• Review
 
• Published January 2019

Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.

Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, Gompels L, Edwards T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan 12; [Epub ahead of print].

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health care. This narrative review summarizes short-, medium-, and long-term safety concerns associated with AI implementation in medical care. The authors provide quality control questions to help those involved in developing AI systems detect areas of concern.

PubMed citationFree full text

Related Resources

JOURNAL ARTICLE › STUDY

Cranky comments: detecting clinical decision support malfunctions through free-text override reasons.

Aaron S, McEvoy DS, Ray S, Hickman TT, Wright A. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26:37-43.

JOURNAL ARTICLE › STUDY

Evaluation of harm associated with high dose-range clinical decision support overrides in the intensive care unit.

Wong A, Rehr C, Seger DL, et al. Drug Saf. 2018 Dec 1; [Epub ahead of print].

JOURNAL ARTICLE › COMMENTARY

Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence.

Shortliffe EH, Sepúlveda MJ. JAMA. 2018;320:2199-2200.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

AI can't replace doctors. But it can make them better.

Parikh R. MIT Technol Rev. October 23, 2018.

JOURNAL ARTICLE › REVIEW

Impact of interactions between drugs and laboratory test results on diagnostic test interpretation—a systematic review.

van Balveren JA, Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG, Erdem-Eraslan L, et al; Dutch Society for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Task Group 'SMILE': Signaling Medication Interactions and Laboratory test Expert system. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56:2004-2009.

View More