sábado, 30 de abril de 2016

Artificial concerns about artificial intelligence

Artificial concerns about artificial intelligence





Artificial concerns?
     


Earlier this year, the American Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) awarded their facetious ‘annual Luddite award’ to a lose coalition of AI sceptics, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk and renown physicist Stephen Hawking. The ITIF labelled the likes of Musk and Hawking ‘alarmists’ engaged in and “feverish hand-wringing about a looming artificial intelligence apocalypse”.

Yet the sarcastic gesture did not go down well. This week Nature published a scathing critique of the ITIF’s ‘fanciful futurism’, defending the ‘legitimate concerns’ of Musk and Hawking.

“Machines and robots that outperform humans across the board could self-improve beyond our control — and their interests might not align with ours. This extreme scenario, which cannot be discounted, is what captures most popular attention. But it is misleading to dismiss all concerns as worried about this.”
“Few foresaw that the Internet and other technologies would open the way for mass, and often indiscriminate, surveillance by intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, threatening principles of privacy and the right to dissent. AI could make such surveillance more widespread and more powerful.”
“Many experts worry that AI and robots are now set to replace repetitive but skilled jobs…The spectre of permanent mass unemployment, and increased inequality that hits hardest along lines of class, race and gender, is perhaps all too real.”
Ironically, the risks of AI are already being felt indirectly as universities lose young talent to the corporate sector.
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/artificial-concerns/11850#sthash.LhTGpk9r.dpuf







Bioedge



Although it has been called the world’s most dangerous idea, transhumanism probably provokes more ridicule than fear. Uploading one’s brain onto the internet or talk of thousand-year life spans seems to defy common sense. 
Nonetheless, my theory is that transhumanism is the logical outcome of a lot of contemporary bioethical theory. So developments in transhumanism are worth paying attention to.
The biggest story at the moment is the quixotic campaign of the head of the Transhumanist Party, Zoltan Istvan, for president of the United States. He is a philosophy and religious studies graduate of Columbia University and has worked as a journalist for the National Geographic Channel.
Mr Istvan has been running a blog on the Huffington Post for a while about his campaign which aims to make the platform of his party more plausible. In the latest post he defines transhumanism as “the radical field of science that aims to turn humans into, for lack of a better word, gods”. So while transhumanism is resolutely atheistic, it has religious aspirations.
And unlike Richard Dawkins and other militant atheists, Istvan argues that our responsibility is to transcend evolution. He writes: “the human body is a mediocre vessel for our actual possibilities in this material universe. Our biology severely limits us. As a species we are far from finished and therefore unacceptable… Biology is for beasts, not future transhumanists.”
It’s a curious development. While many prominent scientific thinkers want to abolish God and treat man as one beast amongst many, transhumanists want to abolish evolution and recreate God (or gods). 


Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge

This week in BioEdge

by Michael Cook | May 01, 2016
Government to fund study

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
What did Will have to say about medicine and health?

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Let them choose for themselves

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Suicide crisis in remote towns highlights need for caution

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
There are risks, but it could save lives

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
In a world first, the State of Kuwait will require all citizens and visitors to provide DNA samples to government authorities.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
Criticism is mounting in Australia about the sale of low-evidence complementary medicines in pharmacies.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
This week Nature published a strident editorial defending 'legitimate concerns' about contemporary AI research.
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

Sale of complementary medicines unethical – Australian doctors

Sale of complementary medicines unethical – Australian doctors



Sale of complementary medicines unethical: Australian doctors
     


Criticism is mounting in Australia about the sale of low-evidence complementary medicines in pharmacies.

An ABC radio report last month censured the Australian Pharmacy Guild for its lax regulation of the sale of dubious complementary or alterative treatments. Reporter Ann Arnold interviewed leading pharmacist Adam Phillips, who is indignant about the widespread sale of products like ‘Liver Detox’ and Vitamin B3 tablets that claim to ‘release energy from the blood’.

In March The Medical Journal of Australia published an opinion piece by academic physician Dr. Edzard Ernst, in which Ernst criticized the rebranding of ‘complementary medicine’ as integrative medicine’:

“It has been claimed that integrative medicine is merely a rebranding exercise for alternative medicine, and a critical assessment of the treatments that integrative clinics currently offer confirms this suspicion.”

Ernst slammed the field of integrative medicine, calling it both unscientific and unethical:

“Integrative medicine is an ill-conceived concept which turns out to be largely about the promotion and use of unproven or disproven therapies. It thus is in conflict with the principles of both evidence-based medicine and medical ethics.”

The MJA went on to publish a poll of readers in which 79% of respondents called the sale of low-evidence alternative medicines “unethical”.

In a scathing article, Chris Brooker – editor of the Australian Journal of Pharmacy Daily – suggested that the complementary and alternative medicines industry violated basic principles of commercial pharmaceutical ethics.
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/sale-of-complementary-medicines-unethical-australian-doctors/11851#sthash.VikLmXVs.dpuf





Bioedge

Although it has been called the world’s most dangerous idea, transhumanism probably provokes more ridicule than fear. Uploading one’s brain onto the internet or talk of thousand-year life spans seems to defy common sense. 
Nonetheless, my theory is that transhumanism is the logical outcome of a lot of contemporary bioethical theory. So developments in transhumanism are worth paying attention to.
The biggest story at the moment is the quixotic campaign of the head of the Transhumanist Party, Zoltan Istvan, for president of the United States. He is a philosophy and religious studies graduate of Columbia University and has worked as a journalist for the National Geographic Channel.
Mr Istvan has been running a blog on the Huffington Post for a while about his campaign which aims to make the platform of his party more plausible. In the latest post he defines transhumanism as “the radical field of science that aims to turn humans into, for lack of a better word, gods”. So while transhumanism is resolutely atheistic, it has religious aspirations.
And unlike Richard Dawkins and other militant atheists, Istvan argues that our responsibility is to transcend evolution. He writes: “the human body is a mediocre vessel for our actual possibilities in this material universe. Our biology severely limits us. As a species we are far from finished and therefore unacceptable… Biology is for beasts, not future transhumanists.”
It’s a curious development. While many prominent scientific thinkers want to abolish God and treat man as one beast amongst many, transhumanists want to abolish evolution and recreate God (or gods). 

Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
This week in BioEdge

by Michael Cook | May 01, 2016
Government to fund study

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
What did Will have to say about medicine and health?

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Let them choose for themselves

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Suicide crisis in remote towns highlights need for caution

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
There are risks, but it could save lives

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
In a world first, the State of Kuwait will require all citizens and visitors to provide DNA samples to government authorities.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
Criticism is mounting in Australia about the sale of low-evidence complementary medicines in pharmacies.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
This week Nature published a strident editorial defending 'legitimate concerns' about contemporary AI research.
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

Kuwait to establish national DNA record

Kuwait to establish national DNA record





Kuwait to establish national DNA record
     


In a world first, the State of Kuwait will require all citizens and visitors to provide DNA samples to government authorities.

The new security measure, which was approved by the nation’s government in July 2015, mandates that all visitors must provide police with a DNA record (most likely in the form of a standard cheek swab) before they enter the country.

Government officials say that the new requirement will be a very useful means of combatting crime, as it allows for the matching of DNA specimens from crime scenes with the DNA code of any member of the population.

“DNA tests have proven very effective over the past decade and have been used in solving many crimes by matching biological evidence collected from crime scenes with databases”, an anonymous official told the Kuwait Times.

Officials suggest that the samples will be stored securely and

The government intends to store the specimens of visitors, as well as that it will be hard for even lab staff to access sensitive identifying information about the source of the sample.

International NGO Human Rights Watch has stridently criticised the new legislation. In a statement released when the laws were first approved, Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson said,

“Many measures could potentially be useful in protecting against terrorist attacks. I suppose videotaping every user of a public toilet could be useful too, but that kind of intrusion is hardly necessary or proportionate, and neither is compulsory DNA testing.”

Under the law, individuals who refuse to provide a sample could face up to 7 years in prison
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/kuwait-to-establish-national-dna-record/11852#sthash.5yiZjGiL.dpuf











Bioedge



Although it has been called the world’s most dangerous idea, transhumanism probably provokes more ridicule than fear. Uploading one’s brain onto the internet or talk of thousand-year life spans seems to defy common sense. 
Nonetheless, my theory is that transhumanism is the logical outcome of a lot of contemporary bioethical theory. So developments in transhumanism are worth paying attention to.
The biggest story at the moment is the quixotic campaign of the head of the Transhumanist Party, Zoltan Istvan, for president of the United States. He is a philosophy and religious studies graduate of Columbia University and has worked as a journalist for the National Geographic Channel.
Mr Istvan has been running a blog on the Huffington Post for a while about his campaign which aims to make the platform of his party more plausible. In the latest post he defines transhumanism as “the radical field of science that aims to turn humans into, for lack of a better word, gods”. So while transhumanism is resolutely atheistic, it has religious aspirations.
And unlike Richard Dawkins and other militant atheists, Istvan argues that our responsibility is to transcend evolution. He writes: “the human body is a mediocre vessel for our actual possibilities in this material universe. Our biology severely limits us. As a species we are far from finished and therefore unacceptable… Biology is for beasts, not future transhumanists.”
It’s a curious development. While many prominent scientific thinkers want to abolish God and treat man as one beast amongst many, transhumanists want to abolish evolution and recreate God (or gods). 


Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge

This week in BioEdge

by Michael Cook | May 01, 2016
Government to fund study

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
What did Will have to say about medicine and health?

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Let them choose for themselves

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
Suicide crisis in remote towns highlights need for caution

by Michael Cook | Apr 30, 2016
There are risks, but it could save lives

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
In a world first, the State of Kuwait will require all citizens and visitors to provide DNA samples to government authorities.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
Criticism is mounting in Australia about the sale of low-evidence complementary medicines in pharmacies.

by Xavier Symons | Apr 30, 2016
This week Nature published a strident editorial defending 'legitimate concerns' about contemporary AI research.
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

CDC - Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation(FACE)Program: What's New - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic

CDC - Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation(FACE)Program: What's New - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic



OR_Toolkit_042016
OR FACE Toolbox Talks
04/29
14KY048 04/28
14KY039 04/28
WA_71-146-2016
  • Fatality Narrative - as slideshow (To view as a slideshow, open the file by clicking the "as slideshow" link, click “Tools” in the command bar menu and then “Full Screen Mode” in the drop down menu. Or you can press ctrl+L.)
04/26
NSC_S+H_052016
National Safety Council, Safety+Health Magazine
FACE Value - Worker Killed by Material Handler
04/26
14KY033 04/26
MI_Hazard_Alert_042016 04/19
OSHA_Comp_Resources_042016 04/14
2013-04

EHC Update: Draft Key Questions for Anxiety in Children and Treatments for Adults with Schizophrenia

EHC Update: Draft Key Questions for Anxiety in Children and Treatments for Adults with Schizophrenia

Effective Health Care Program - Helping You Make Better Treatment Choices

The following have been posted to the EHC Web site:

Draft Key Questions

Key questions for the following topics are available for comment until May 18, 2016:
To access all EHC topics currently available for comment, go to http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/research-available-for-comment/.

Effective Health Care
http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov

Drug Information Update- Federal judge enters order of permanent injunction against Paul W. Franck

FDA logo, hand holding tablets, Division of Drug Information, Know the moment it happens
The Division of Drug Information (DDI)- serving the public by providing information on human drug products and drug product regulation by FDA.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that U.S. District Judge Carlos E. Mendoza entered an order of permanent injunction against Paul W. Franck of Ocala, Florida. According to the complaint filed with the consent decree, Franck manufactured and distributed drug products that were adulterated and misbranded in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). The U.S. Department of Justice brought the action on behalf of the FDA.
The order prohibits Franck from manufacturing, holding and distributing sterile drug products until he complies with the FD&C Act and its regulations, in addition to other requirements 
For more information, please visit: Paul W. Franck.

Ucosaz aglutinará a Médicos, Farmacéuticos, Veterinarios, Odontólogos y Enfermeros de Zaragoza

Ucosaz aglutinará a Médicos, Farmacéuticos, Veterinarios, Odontólogos y Enfermeros de Zaragoza

Noticias Farmacia

ucosaz aglutinaraacu

Nace fruto del compromiso con el impulso y defensa de la Sanidad y los valores profesionales en la sociedad aragonesa.
La Asociación Unión de Colegios Sanitarios de la provincia de Zaragoza, bajo el acrónimo UCOSAZ, es una organización de naturaleza asociativa y sin ánimo de lucro que agrupa a los Colegios Oficiales de Médicos, Farmacéuticos, Veterinarios, Odontólogos y de Enfermería, en la provincia de Zaragoza. Juntos aglutinan cerca de 16.000 profesionales.
UCOSAZ nace con el objetivo de convertirse en un nuevo foro de debate, opinión y discusión de todas las cuestiones relacionadas con los colegios profesionales sanitarios, así como del ejercicio profesional y su relación con los pacientes. Además de convertirse en un nuevo interlocutor eficaz entre las profesiones y el Gobierno de Aragón.
La nueva asociación colegial defenderá el derecho constitucional a la protección de la salud y de un sistema sanitario de calidad que vele por el bienestar físico, mental y social de los aragoneses. UCOSAZ aspira a convertirse en un referente en la defensa del modelo colegial español, sustentado sobre la deontología y la excelencia profesional para mejorar los servicios prestados a los pacientes y al resto de la sociedad.
En el comienzo de la actividad de Ucosaz, la Presidencia de la Asociación recae en la Presidenta del Colegio de Médicos de Zaragoza, Concepción Ferrer. El resto de cargos, son los siguientes:
Vicepresidente: Luis Rasal (Colegio Odontólogos)
Secretario: Jesús García (Colegio Veterinarios)
Vicesecretario: Ramón Jordán (Colegio Farmacéuticos)


Tesorero: Juan José Porcar (Colegio Enfermería)