sábado, 20 de febrero de 2016

BioEdge: Indian Medical Association backs pre-natal sex tests

BioEdge: Indian Medical Association backs pre-natal sex tests

Indian Medical Association backs pre-natal sex tests

India’s gender imbalance is possibly the worst in the world because doctors routinely abort unborn females after an ultrasound test. In 1996 the Indian government banned prenatal sex determination.

Twenty years later the slide in the sex ratio has not stopped. According to the 2011 Census the child sex ratio fell from 927 girls for 1000 boys in 2001 to 919 girls. These are the worst figures since 1961.

So the Indian Medical Association has come up with a better idea. Instead of banning prenatal sex tests, the government should make them compulsory.

The idea was first mooted by Maneka Gandhi, the Indian Women and Child Development Minister. She proposed that each pregnancy should be registered and the sex disclosed to the parents. If a girl, the pregnancy should be tracked and recorded.

A great idea, says the secretary general of the Indian Medical Association, Dr K.K. Aggarwal. “Such a step, if taken, will help institutionalise the safety of the girl foetus, which, in several parts of the country, is aborted because of societal obligations. Not only will it help document women with girl children in a better way, but would also help in fixing responsibility in cases requiring legal interference.”

Not all doctors were thrilled by the proposal.

"This is the strangest, most bizarre idea I have ever heard in my life," said Puneet Bedi, a New Delhi gynaecologist, who has been campaigning against female foeticide for nearly three decades. Couples could used abortion drugs and visit the doctor afterwards. "At this point, doctors would not be able to deny treatment to the woman and the abortion would be a fait accompli," said Dr Bedi. "This would be a dangerous move and female foeticide will spiral upwards - all blame shifts to parents, with doctors escaping blame."

Others doctors warn that tracking each of India’s 27 million annual pregnancies would be a bureaucratic nightmare. Mandatory disclosure would also transfer responsibility for female foeticide to the pregnant woman, allowing doctors to evade responsibility.

The IMA’s support for the idea seems to stem from despair at the failure of anti-gendercide campaigns. “There are two ways the administration can check and stop female foeticide,” writes Dr Aggarwal. “First is to strengthen and properly implement the existing laws. Second is to spread awareness in society to end discrimination. Till the time society does not put an end to this discrimination, law is our only hope
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/indian-medical-association-backs-pre-natal-sex-tests/11766#sthash.B25yQ9NC.dpuf


Canada’s legislators are still wrestling with how to frame a new euthanasia law. One interesting contribution to the debate comes from a senator who became a mental health advocate after her husband, a former member of Parliament, committed suicide in 2009. Senator Denise Batters suggests that psychological suffering should be excluded as a grounds for euthanasia.
"I have seen ... the devastating impact, not only for the individual that goes through that pain themselves ... but at the same time ... I've seen the devastating consequences that it can have on the immediate family members," she said in an interview with The Canadian Press.
"Canadians may support assisted suicide, but they want extremely strong safeguards and I think that when I talk to people about the possibility of psychological suffering being included as ... sole grounds for having access to physician-assisted suicide, they are horrified and stunned that could be a possibility," she said. “There aren't many, many thousands of people in this country who have lived through a period of severe anxiety and depression and come out the other side".
The senator is right. What people who are suffering psychologically need is more personal and better medical support, not a lethal injection. 

Michael Cook

This week in BioEdge

by Michael Cook | Feb 20, 2016
Since legalisation 991 people have died.

by Michael Cook | Feb 20, 2016
Rising infertility is one cause of a increasing demand

by Michael Cook | Feb 20, 2016
If banning them won't work, perhaps making them compulsory will

by Xavier Symons | Feb 20, 2016
A leading evolutionary biologist has labelled IVF an “evolutionary experiment” that may have serious effects on children in later life.

by Xavier Symons | Feb 20, 2016
Two insightful articles recently published in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy may provide much needed clarity in philosophical debates about personhood.

by Xavier Symons | Feb 20, 2016
Australian doctors are refusing to release the baby of an asylum seeker couple from hospital until a “suitable home environment” has been found for her.

by Xavier Symons | Feb 20, 2016
Russia has rejected allegations that it bombed a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in northern Syria last Monday.

by Michael Cook | Feb 20, 2016
After 70 years, have a physician's obligations changed?

by Andrew George | Feb 20, 2016
A single vulnerable subject exposed to a dread disease without animal trials -- it's not sounding good
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

No hay comentarios: