domingo, 12 de agosto de 2012

Cost-effectiveness of expanded newborn screenin... [Value Health. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Cost-effectiveness of expanded newborn screenin... [Value Health. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

2012 Jul;15(5):613-21. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Cost-effectiveness of expanded newborn screening in Texas.


Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.



Texas House Bill 790 resulted in the expansion of the newborn screening panel from 7 disorders to 27 disorders. Implementation of this change began in 2007. The objective of this study was to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the expanded newborn screening program compared with the previous standard screening in Texas.


A Markov model (for a hypothetical cohort of Texas births in 2007) was constructed to compare lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the expanded newborn screening and preexpansion newborn screening. Estimates of costs, probabilities of sequelae, and utilities for disorder categories were obtained from a combination of Texas statistics, the literature, and expert opinion. A baseline discount rate of 3% was used for both costs and QALYs, with a range of 0% to 5%. Analyses were conducted from a payer's perspective, and so only direct medical cost estimates were included.


The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for expanded versus preexpansion screening was about $11,560 per QALY. The results remained robust to both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.


Expanded newborn screening does result in additional expenses to the payer, but it also improves patient outcomes by preventing avoidable morbidity and mortality. The screened population benefits from greater QALYs as compared with the unscreened population. Overall, expanded newborn screening in Texas was estimated to be a cost-effective option as compared with unexpanded newborn screening.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[PubMed - in process]

No hay comentarios: