domingo, 7 de diciembre de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Efforts of a Kansas Foundation to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health by Funding Community Trails, 2012 - CDC

FULL-TEXT ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Efforts of a Kansas Foundation to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health by Funding Community Trails, 2012 - CDC



Preventing Chronic Disease Logo



Image of eCard



Efforts of a Kansas Foundation to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health by Funding Community Trails, 2012

Katie M. Heinrich, PhD; Joseph Lightner, MPH; Katherine B. Oestman, MPH, CHES; S. Morgan Hughey, MPH; Andrew T. Kaczynski, PhD

Suggested citation for this article: Heinrich KM, Lightner J, Oestman KB, Hughey SM, Kaczynski AT. Efforts of a Kansas Foundation to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health by Funding Community Trails, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140356. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140356External Web Site Icon.
PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction
Trails are associated with increased physical activity; however, little is known about the process of building trails by various types of organizations. From 2005 through 2012 the Sunflower Foundation: Health Care for Kansans (Sunflower) funded multiple organizations to construct 70 trails of varying lengths and surfaces in municipalities, schools, and communities across Kansas. The purpose of this study was to assess the process of developing and implementing community trail projects across Kansas with funding from a public foundation.
Methods
In 2012, we stratified funded organizations by type and conducted proportional random sampling to select 20 key informants from those organizations to participate in structured telephone interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers coded interview transcripts according to issues identified by participants.
Results
Issues associated with trail-building identified as important were collaboration among groups, unexpected construction costs, champions for the project, and level of difficulty of construction. Participants indicated that trails facilitated physical activity. Trails were integrated into communities through events such as walking events and other promotional efforts; these efforts were thought to increase trail use. The perceived outcomes of building the trails included providing the community with a physical activity resource, inspiring the community to start additional trail projects, and increasing the physical activity of local residents.
Conclusion
Sunflower’s funding was instrumental in developing trail projects to provide new physical activity resources across Kansas. Public health practitioners seeking to increase physical activity should seek funding from foundations that focus on health.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Sunflower Foundation: Health Care for Kansans for providing the funding necessary to complete this evaluation of trail construction across communities in Kansas. We also thank Erin Osler for her assistance with collecting data for the evaluation.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: S. Morgan Hughey, MPH, Doctoral Student, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St, Room 519, Columbia, SC 29208. Telephone: 864-978-6852. E-mail: morganhughey@gmail.com.
Author Affiliations: Katie M. Heinrich, Joseph Lightner, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas; Katherine B. Oestman, Riley County Health Department, Manhattan, Kansas; Andrew T. Kaczynski, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

References

  1. Haskell WL, Blair SN, Hill JO. Physical activity: health outcomes and importance for public health policy. Prev Med 2009;49(4):280–2. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK. Physical activity in US adults: compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(4):454–61. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40(1):181–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 2006;27(1):297–322. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Heinrich KM, Lee RE, Suminski RR, Regan GR, Reese-Smith JY, Howard HH, et al. Associations between the built environment and physical activity in public housing residents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007;4:56. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40(7 Suppl):S550–66. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Brownson RC, Chang JJ, Eyler AA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Saelens BE, et al. Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. Am J Public Health 2004;94(3):473–83. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Krizek KJ, Johnson PJ. Proximity to trails and retail: effects on urban cycling and walking. J Am Plann Assoc 2006;72(1):33–42. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Starnes HA, Troped PJ, Klenosky DB, Doehring AM. Trails and physical activity: a review. J Phys Act Health 2011;8(8):1160–74. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leis Sci 2007;29(4):315–54.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health 2001;91(12):1995–2003. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  12. Deshpande AD, Baker EA, Lovegreen SL, Brownson RC. Environmental correlates of physical activity among individuals with diabetes in the rural Midwest. Diabetes Care 2005;28(5):1012–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Reed JA, Ainsworth BE, Wilson DK, Mixon G, Cook A. Awareness and use of community walking trails. Prev Med 2004;39(5):903–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, Reininger B, Ureda JR, Thompson SJ. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med 2001;32(2):191–200. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health 2008;98(8):1451–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Fitzhugh EC, Bassett DR Jr, Evans MF. Urban trails and physical activity: a natural experiment. Am J Prev Med 2010;39(3):259–62. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Librett JJ, Yore MM, Schmid TL. Characteristics of physical activity levels among trail users in a US national sample. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(5):399–405.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Evenson KR, Herring AH, Huston SL. Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail. Am J Prev Med 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):177–85. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Boyd RL, Caito NM, Duggan K, Housemann RA, et al. A community-based approach to promoting walking in rural areas. Am J Prev Med 2004;27(1):28–34. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Wang G, Macera CA, Scudder-Soucie B, Schmid T, Pratt M, Buchner D. A cost-benefit analysis of physical activity using bike/pedestrian trails. Health Promot Pract 2005;6(2):174–9. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Evenson KR, Levinger D, Maddock JE, Pluto D, et al. Policy influences on community trail development. J Health Polit Policy Law 2008;33(3):407–27. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Spero JE. The global role of US foundations. New York (NY): The Foundation Center; 2010. http://foundationcenter.org/gainknowledge/research/pdf/global_role_of_us_foundations.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2014.
  23. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:173–202. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Who we are: mission and values. Topeka (KS): Sunflower Foundation: Health Care for Kansans. http://www.sunflowerfoundation.org/who_we_are/mission_values. Accessed September 12, 2014.
  25. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1990.
  26. Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health, and social care research. Eastleigh (GB): INVOLVE Advisory Group, National Institute for Health Research; 2009. http://www.invo.org.uk/posttypepublication/exploring-impact-public-involvement-in-nhs-public-health-and-social-care-research/. Accessed June 20, 2014.
  27. Schasberger MG, Hussa CS, Polgar MF, McMonagle JA, Burke SJ, Gegaris AJ Jr. Promoting and developing a trail network across suburban, rural, and urban communities. Am J Prev Med 2009;37(6 Suppl 2):S336–44. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  28. Gray B, Wood DJ. Collaborative alliances: moving from practice to theory. J Appl Behav Sci 1991;27(1):3–22. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon
  29. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health 2000;21(1):369–402.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon

No hay comentarios: