Forced organ harvesting may still be occurring – Chinese official
by Xavier Symons | 11 Feb 2017 |
A senior government official has admitted that forced organ harvesting from executed prisoners may still be occurring in China, sparking calls for international inspections in the country.
Huang Jiefu, a former deputy health minister who oversees China’s transplantation scheme, made the announcement earlier this week at a controversial Vatican conference on illegal organ trafficking.
“There is zero tolerance [of forced harvesting]” Mr. Jiefu told reporters at the conference. “However, China is a big country with a 1.3 billion population so I am sure, definitely, there is some violation of the law”.
Experts at the Rome conference were sceptical of China’s efforts to end forced organ harvesting, and Dr. Jacob Lavee, president of Israel's transplant society, insisted that the World Health Organisation be allowed to conduct surprise inspections and interview donor relatives in China.
"As long as there is no accountability for what took place ... there can be no guarantee for ethical reform," he told the conference.
He was joined by Dr. Gabriel Danilovitch, from the UCLA Medical Center, who challenged the Chinese delegation to declare straight out if prisoner organs were no longer used.
Nicholas Bequelin, the east Asia director for Amnesty International, told The Guardian that forced organ harvesting was still taking place in China.“They haven’t stopped the practice and won’t stop. They have a need for organ transplants that far outpace the availability of organs,” Bequelin said.
A child who self-harms must be one of the most agonising experiences a parent can have. But it is relatively common. A study in The Lancet a few years ago found that about 1 in 12 teenagers, mostly girls, engaged in self-harming behaviour, with the most common methods cutting or burning. Most of them stop as adults, but some continue. It is a phenomenon which still seems to baffle the medical profession, despite the abundance of statistics.
In this issue of BioEdge, we report on an interesting response to self-harm, at least for some patients – educate them to minimise the harm, but supply them with razors. Given that harm minimisation is a popular public policy approach in other areas, like drugs, this makes some sense. But I think that most people will regard it as quite confronting. What do you think?
|NEWS THIS WEEK|
by Michael Cook | Feb 11, 2017It could be more respectful for their autonomy
by Michael Cook | Feb 11, 2017Theorists make a distinction between aborting and killing
by Michael Cook | Feb 11, 2017Paolo Macchiarini is one of many who have fallen from the heights
by Xavier Symons | Feb 11, 2017Chinese women are using frozen embryos to conceive a second child.
by Michael Cook | Feb 11, 2017Government is studying whether or not to legalise sex selection
by Xavier Symons | Feb 11, 2017A British High Court Judge has ordered that a 7-month-old boy be given a meningitis vaccine.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 11, 2017A senior government official has admitted that forced organ harvesting from executed prisoners may still be occurring in China.
by Xavier Symons | Feb 11, 2017A bill to legalise euthanasia has been introduced to Spanish parliament.
by Michael Cook | Feb 10, 2017A British actress speaks out about gene editing.
|IN DEPTH THIS WEEK|
by Hannah Brown | Feb 07, 2017Exaggerating the facts helps no one.
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Email: email@example.comNew Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario