Cost and yield considerations when expanding recruitment for genetic studies: the primary open-angle African American glaucoma genetics study. - PubMed - NCBI
Cost and yield considerations when expanding recruitment for genetic studies: the primary open-angle African American glaucoma genetics study.
Salowe R1,
O'Keefe L1,
Merriam S1,
Lee R1,
Khachatryan N1,
Sankar P1,
Miller-Ellis E1,
Lehman A1,
Addis V1,
Murphy W2,
Henderer J3,
Maguire M1,
O'Brien J4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
African Americans have been historically under-represented in genetic studies. More research is needed on effective recruitment strategies for this population, especially on approaches that supplement traditional clinic enrollment. This study evaluates the cost and efficacy of four supplemental recruitment methods employed by the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. METHODS:
After enrolling 2304 patients from University of Pennsylvania ophthalmology clinics, the POAAGG study implemented four new recruitment methods to supplement clinic enrollment. These methods included: 1) outreach in the local community, 2) in-house screening of community members ("in-reach"), 3) expansion to two external sites, and 4) sampling of the Penn Medicine Biobank. The cost per subject was calculated for each method and enrollment among cases, controls, and suspects was reported. RESULTS:
The biobank offered the lowest cost ($5/subject) and highest enrollment yield (n = 2073) of the four methods, but provided very few glaucoma cases (n = 31). External sites provided 88% of cases recruited from the four methods (n = 388; $85/subject), but case enrollment at these sites declined over the next 9 months as the pool of eligible subjects was depleted. Outreach and in-reach screenings of community members were very high cost for low return on enrollment ($569/subject for 102 subjects and $606/subject for 45 subjects, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:
The biobank offered the most cost-effective method for control enrollment, while expansion to external sites was necessary to recruit richly phenotyped cases. These recruitment methods helped the POAAGG study to exceed enrollment of the discovery cohort (n = 5500) 6 months in advance of the predicated deadline and could be adopted by other large genetic studies seeking to supplement clinic enrollment. KEYWORDS:
African American enrollment; African American recruitment; African Americans; Biobanks; Enrollment; External sites; Genetic studies; Outreach; Recruitment
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario