lunes, 6 de junio de 2016

MercatorNet: A sad tale of dodgy statistics

MercatorNet: A sad tale of dodgy statistics

A sad tale of dodgy statistics

How was same-sex marriage accepted so quickly? In part, by telling some fibs.
Michael Cook | Jun 6 2016 | comment 

How many children are being raised by same-sex parents in the United States at the moment?
(a) 200,000
(b) 1.5 to 5 million  
(c) 8 to 10 million
(d) 14 million
(e) 28 million
The correct figure is believed to be 200,000. It is the one mentioned by the US Supreme Court in the majority decision in Obergefell v Hodges which legalised same-sex marriage last year.
However, figures in the millions have been cited by serious legal and social science journals in the recent past. In 2007 journal called Pediatric Nursing estimated that the number of children in same-sex households could be as many as 28 million. This was nearly 40 percent of all American children.
Some scholars have accepted an estimate of 14 million children and have even attributed it to the US Census Bureau.
In an article in the latest issue of the BYU Journal of Public Law*, Professor Walter Schumm, of Kansas State University, examines the incredible range of estimates in 90 law journal articles and 71 social science or medical articles. Only four of the law journal articles and 13 of the social science or medical journal articles carried estimates below 1 million – when the real number was probably one-fifth of that.
The pattern of citation is interesting. Initially academics were citing very high estimates but as time went on the figures began to fall as some of them realised that the estimates were probably inflated.
The key point made by Professor Schumm and his colleagues is that when the legal groundwork for same-sex marriage was laid in the 1990s, courts and scholars were working on the assumption that there were millions of children living in same-sex households. They write:
“[It was] almost as if the scholars were stacking the deck with evidence that would support a perceived need for same-sex marriage to help the many millions of children estimated to be involved with same-sex couples who might potentially marry, if it were legal.”
The implication of this research are dismaying. One of the most powerful motives for legalising same-sex marriage was to provide a safe and stable environment for the children. The smaller the number of children, obviously, the less pressing the argument. In 1999 in the landmark case of Baker v Vermont, the Vermont Supreme Court created civil unions for same-sex couples, on the assumption that the number of children in such arrangements ranged between 1.5 and 5 million.
A survey of dry-as-dust statistics in journal articles gives little insight into the motives of the authors for such sloppy, negligent scholarship. But Schumm observes that legal sources appeared more reluctant to report lower estimates than social science journals, “especially in more recent years”. He concludes:
“the apparent widespread acceptance of impossibly high estimates of the numbers of children potentially affected by changes in the legal status of same-sex marriage may have helped change public opinion in a major direction in favor of same-sex marriage.”
Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet.
* Walter R. Schumm et al. “Assessing the History of Exaggerated Estimates of the Number of Children Being Raised by Same-Sex Parents as Reported in Both Legal and Social Science Sources.” BYU Journal of Public Law. Vol 30, No. 2.
- See more at:


Muhammad Ali died on Friday at the age of 74. He was an amazing fighter and the internet lit up with articles and videos of his best fights and his most memorable quips. But they all highlighted the public man. There was another side to him as well, his religious faith. Sure, he had a colourful personal life, but his convictions were sincere. Check out the video in which he talks about the afterlife:
"God is watching me. God don't praise me because I beat Joe Frazier. God don't give nothing about Joe Frazier. God don't care nothing about England or America as far as we aware of. He wants to know how do we treat each other, how do we help each other. So I'm going to dedicate my life to using my name and popularity to helping charities, helping people, uniting people…..we need somebody in the world to help us all make peace. So when I die, if there's a heaven, I want to see it."

Michael Cook

Why? We hanker after instant gratification
Walter R. Schumm | CONJUGALITY | 6 June 2016
A social science expert ruefully surveys a losing battle over transgenderism.
Vale, Muhammad Ali
Michael Cook | ABOVE | 6 June 2016
At least he thought about where he was going
A sad tale of dodgy statistics
Michael Cook | CONJUGALITY | 6 June 2016
How was same-sex marriage accepted so quickly? In part, by telling some fibs.
What will happen when antibiotics stop working?
Roger Pickup | FEATURES | 6 June 2016
How will society change in a post-antibiotic era? Will we still greet people with a hug or handshake?
Why the two child policy hasn’t changed China
Shannon Roberts | DEMOGRAPHY IS DESTINY | 6 June 2016
A former Wall Street Journalist China correspondent discusses the issues.
MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

MercatorNet: A sad tale of dodgy statistics

No hay comentarios: