What does Brexit mean for bioethics?
by Xavier Symons | 25 Jun 2016 |
It is tempting to provide an alarmist answer to this question. Yet it is wise to avoid the apocalyptic tone of recent media coverage and first to flag what is not going to change in UK biomedical ethics policy.
As highlighted by a post on the Christian Medical Fellowship Blogs, the UK will not (or, at least, not yet) be leaving the Council of Europe (CoE) – this entity does not fall under the auspices of the EU. That the UK will remain in the CoE is significant, as this is the umbrella organisation for what is known as the Committee on Bioethics, an influential policy body that seeks to apply principles outlined in the Convention on Human Rights and Medicine to new issues in medical technology and research.
The European Court on Human Rights also falls within the purview of the CoE. Importantly, The ECHR has handed down significant decisions within the area of conscientious objection in healthcare.
Yet some suggest the Brexit vote may effect disability rights legislation and regulations in the UK. EU directives about equal access and reasonable adjustment in the workplace have been described as a “double lock” on British legislation such as the 1995 Disability Discrimination Act. Disability advocates fear that the Brexit may in the long run lead to a loss of “hard won rights” for disabled people.
There are also significant concerns about the effects of Brexit on UK public health policies that are underpinned by legislation from the European Parliament. Writing in the Journal of Public Health earlier this year, Martin McKee and Michael J. Galsworthy of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine suggested that Brexit could negatively affect public health policy in areas ranging from environmental issues to anti-smoking policies and research ethics guidelines.
“What does Brexit mean for bioethics?” is our lead story today. Given that the Leavers were not expected to win and that the pundits have widely different views of the future of the politics and economies of the UK and the EU, it is unwise to be dogmatic on the issue.
However, the question highlights the importance of Britain in the world of bioethics. Britain is the home of utilitarianism, which is the dominant philosophy in bioethical discourse at the moment. The medical and scientific establishment is dominated by a utilitarian mindset which has set the agenda for debates on embryo research, stem cell research and assisted dying around the world. As one cynical writer commented, “when it comes to bioethics, Europe might be better off without Britain”.
There is something in this. Although I am handicapped by a big language barrier, my impression is that from Norway to Italy there is much more depth and diversity in bioethical discourse across the Channel. The Greens and the Christian Churches are much more influential, to say nothing of Continental philosophy, which despises utilitarianism as vacuous and naïve. If England (the pundits all agree that Scotland will secede) loses its biomedical industry to the EU, perhaps utilitarian bioethics will lose some of its funding and its influence. That would be no bad thing, I think.
******
Sorry, guys, but BioEdge will be taking a holiday during July. Our next issue will be in the first week of August.
Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
| This week in BioEdge | |
by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
Brexit may lead to significant changes in biomedical policy in the UKby Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Oxford don tries living as a badger to expand his horizonsby Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Fails to surface in the mediaby Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
Australia’s asylum seeker policies have been subject to intense international scrutiny – even in the world of bioethics.by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Getting in touch with your inner earth mother goddessby Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
A new UK Parliamentary Inquiry into conscientious objection was launched this month.by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
The American tabloid media was abuzz this week with news that a New York Mathematics Professor had fathered 22 children through informal sperm donation.by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
A practical application of utilitarian theory spurned by the publicby Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Confusing signals from China over stem cells and organ transplantsby Wesley J. Smith | Jun 21, 2016
A leading voice in American bioethics peers into the future in his new bookBioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario