Children can write their own advance care directives in Victoria
by Michael Cook | 7 Oct 2017 |
In a world first, the Australian state of Victoria is allowing children of any age to write their own advance care directive that doctors are obliged to follow. The new ACDs, which come into effect in March next year, will allow a child to decide on their treatment preferences, provided he or she was competent at the time of making the declaration, and the statement was witnessed by a medical practitioner and one other witness.
If a child has made a valid advance directive in which they have included instructions to refuse a particular medical treatment, such as dialysis or chemotherapy, a health practitioner must not provide that treatment.
Up until now, laws around the world have given parents the final say in decisions about treatment options for minors. The new laws are controversial, and run contrary to many of the legal precedents on the decision-making capacity of minors.
Writing in The Conversation, health law expert Carolyn Johnston advocated for a collaborative approach to drafting ACDs for children:
If a child has made a valid advance directive in which they have included instructions to refuse a particular medical treatment, such as dialysis or chemotherapy, a health practitioner must not provide that treatment.
Up until now, laws around the world have given parents the final say in decisions about treatment options for minors. The new laws are controversial, and run contrary to many of the legal precedents on the decision-making capacity of minors.
Writing in The Conversation, health law expert Carolyn Johnston advocated for a collaborative approach to drafting ACDs for children:
There has been significant debate amongst bioethicists about the “competency” of children when deciding about treatment options.“Parents want to protect their children and health-care practitioners want to do the best for their patients. Advance directives should be drafted as a collaboration between the child, health professionals and, ideally, parents. This will enable understanding of the possible treatment options, their benefits and harms, and the impact of refusing certain treatment, resulting in a meaningful and effective advance decision.”
Sunday, October 8, 2017
The drugs used for executing American prisoners and the drugs used for assisting suicide are more or less the same. Do they guarantee that patients will, as in Keats' poem, "cease upon the midnight with no pain".
Um, no, or at least no guarantees. Just as some prisoners are tormented in botched executions, some patients in the state of Oregon have taken the lethal drug, gone unconscious, and awakened -- sometimes days later. Read all about it in our lead article.
Um, no, or at least no guarantees. Just as some prisoners are tormented in botched executions, some patients in the state of Oregon have taken the lethal drug, gone unconscious, and awakened -- sometimes days later. Read all about it in our lead article.
Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |
NEWS THIS WEEK | |
by Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
No, sorry, not alwaysby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Challenge to Suicide Act 1961 failsby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Kazuo Ishiguro discussed cloning and organ donation in his 2005 novelby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
It's about time, some will sayby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Sleazy marketing tactics are popular in a competitive fieldby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
As long as they are competent, their requests will be bindingby Xavier Symons | Oct 07, 2017
There are ethical concerns about business practices of genomics companiesby Xavier Symons | Oct 07, 2017
Two Canadian ethicists defend a moratorium on embryo gene-editing, arguing that it reflects an international consensusby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
There are several quasi-religious organisations now operational in Silicon ValleyBioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario