Religions and embryos
by Michael Cook | 7 Oct 2017 |
An special feature in the journal Development lists the attitude of various religions towards human embryos. Author William Neaves writes “How religions view the human embryo depends on beliefs about ensoulment and the inception of personhood, and science can neither prove nor refute the teaching of those religions that consider the zygote to be a human person with an immortal soul.”
Catholicism: Having a centralized government and a definitive teaching authority, the Catholic Church holds the most unified and consistent view, despite some contemporary dissidents. It believes that personhood begins with the fertilisation of an egg by a sperm.
Protestantism: “The decentralized nature of Protestant denominations militates against a consistent position on research with human embryos,” Neaves writes. “Some Protestants oppose this research, and their objection centers on the assumption that collecting cells from a blastocyst kills a human being.”
Buddhism. In general, Buddhists believe that “an embryo acquires personhood after implantation in a mother's uterus, and research may be conducted on human embryos in vitro if intended ‘…to help humankind’”
Hinduism. “Most Hindus believe that the beginning of personhood coincides with the occurrence of reincarnation at the moment of conception, and that the earliest human embryo deserves respect. However, Hinduism is intrinsically flexible, and the destruction of a human embryo can be justified under certain circumstances – for example, to save a mother's life.”
Sikhism. Like Hindus, Sikhs believe that “the beginning of personhood coincides with the occurrence of reincarnation at the moment of conception.”
Judaism. “The embryo is considered to be ‘mere water’ until the 40th day when a soul may take up residence in the developing body, but the Babylonian Talmud only attributes full personhood to a fetus when it is birthed. A younger embryo should be treated respectfully but not as a person, with increasing consideration given according to age. The older it is, the more compelling should be the reasons for ending its life.”
Islam. The Qur’an did not settle the time of “ensoulment” and with its multiplicity of traditions, Islam has no definitive view. Some authorities believe that it begins at 40 days after conception; others at 120 days.
Catholicism: Having a centralized government and a definitive teaching authority, the Catholic Church holds the most unified and consistent view, despite some contemporary dissidents. It believes that personhood begins with the fertilisation of an egg by a sperm.
Protestantism: “The decentralized nature of Protestant denominations militates against a consistent position on research with human embryos,” Neaves writes. “Some Protestants oppose this research, and their objection centers on the assumption that collecting cells from a blastocyst kills a human being.”
Buddhism. In general, Buddhists believe that “an embryo acquires personhood after implantation in a mother's uterus, and research may be conducted on human embryos in vitro if intended ‘…to help humankind’”
Hinduism. “Most Hindus believe that the beginning of personhood coincides with the occurrence of reincarnation at the moment of conception, and that the earliest human embryo deserves respect. However, Hinduism is intrinsically flexible, and the destruction of a human embryo can be justified under certain circumstances – for example, to save a mother's life.”
Sikhism. Like Hindus, Sikhs believe that “the beginning of personhood coincides with the occurrence of reincarnation at the moment of conception.”
Judaism. “The embryo is considered to be ‘mere water’ until the 40th day when a soul may take up residence in the developing body, but the Babylonian Talmud only attributes full personhood to a fetus when it is birthed. A younger embryo should be treated respectfully but not as a person, with increasing consideration given according to age. The older it is, the more compelling should be the reasons for ending its life.”
Islam. The Qur’an did not settle the time of “ensoulment” and with its multiplicity of traditions, Islam has no definitive view. Some authorities believe that it begins at 40 days after conception; others at 120 days.
Sunday, October 8, 2017
The drugs used for executing American prisoners and the drugs used for assisting suicide are more or less the same. Do they guarantee that patients will, as in Keats' poem, "cease upon the midnight with no pain".
Um, no, or at least no guarantees. Just as some prisoners are tormented in botched executions, some patients in the state of Oregon have taken the lethal drug, gone unconscious, and awakened -- sometimes days later. Read all about it in our lead article.
Um, no, or at least no guarantees. Just as some prisoners are tormented in botched executions, some patients in the state of Oregon have taken the lethal drug, gone unconscious, and awakened -- sometimes days later. Read all about it in our lead article.
Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |
NEWS THIS WEEK | |
by Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
No, sorry, not alwaysby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Challenge to Suicide Act 1961 failsby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Kazuo Ishiguro discussed cloning and organ donation in his 2005 novelby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
It's about time, some will sayby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
Sleazy marketing tactics are popular in a competitive fieldby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
As long as they are competent, their requests will be bindingby Xavier Symons | Oct 07, 2017
There are ethical concerns about business practices of genomics companiesby Xavier Symons | Oct 07, 2017
Two Canadian ethicists defend a moratorium on embryo gene-editing, arguing that it reflects an international consensusby Michael Cook | Oct 07, 2017
There are several quasi-religious organisations now operational in Silicon ValleyBioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario