jueves, 7 de agosto de 2014

Preventing Chronic Disease | Cancer Prevention and Worksite Health Promotion: Time to Join Forces - CDC

full-text ►

Preventing Chronic Disease | Cancer Prevention and Worksite Health Promotion: Time to Join Forces - CDC

Preventing Chronic Disease Logo

Cancer Prevention and Worksite Health Promotion: Time to Join Forces

Cancer Prevention in the Workplace Writing Group

Suggested citation for this article: Cancer Prevention in the Workplace Writing Group. Cancer Prevention and Worksite Health Promotion: Time to Join Forces. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:140127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140127External Web Site Icon.

Introduction

The workplace is recognized as a setting that can profoundly influence workers’ health and well-being (1,2). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) workplace health promotion efforts address cancer prevention by focusing on cancer screening programs, community–clinical linkages, and cancer risk factors (eg, tobacco use, physical inactivity) that also influence risk for other chronic diseases (http://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/). Some efforts focus specifically on cancer; some focus on general chronic disease prevention. Additionally, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), part of CDC, provides research and recommendations to address workplace hazards posed by chemicals that may increase cancer risk (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/cancer/policy.html).
Existing resources can be leveraged to expand the scope of workplace initiatives to address additional cancer risk factors and disparities. Changes to the physical and social characteristics of work environments are likely to have greater impact than health education alone (3). Given the aging US population (which is expected to result in a marked increase in the number of cancer diagnoses over the coming decades) and the prevalence of numerous risk factors among working-aged adults (4,5), a multifaceted approach to cancer prevention in the workplace is timely and needed. In addition, community-based prevention efforts may offer unrealized opportunities to reach vulnerable working populations who are not served by workplace health promotion programs. In this essay, we draw attention to a wide variety of available CDC resources and provide ideas for new efforts to advance primary cancer prevention among working adults.

Factors Related to Cancer Risk

Many cancer risk factors could be influenced through efforts targeting the work environment, including facilities, services, and policies. Table 1 shows examples of risk and protective factors that may be amenable to workplace interventions. Some examples are specific to the work environment, such as exposure to known carcinogens (eg, diesel exhaust), higher levels of which are often permitted in the workplace compared with the general environment. Others are behaviors (eg, tobacco use) or chronic conditions (eg, obesity) that may increase cancer risk. The table also provides examples of protective factors (eg, staying physically active) that may reduce cancer risk. These factors affect a high percentage of US workers, so even small changes could have a large impact at the population level. Many of the examples are also related to other health outcomes, and the benefits of addressing them would extend well beyond cancer prevention.

Integrating Health Protection and Health Promotion

Traditionally, workplace health promotion programs have focused on health-related behaviors (eg, tobacco use cessation), while health protection programs have focused on addressing safety and health risks and hazard mitigation. New research provides evidence that integrating these 2 approaches may enhance program effectiveness to improve employee health, safety, and well-being (2). As discussed in the National Prevention Strategy (http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/strategy/), efforts to ensure worker safety on the job while also providing a work environment that supports healthy behaviors can create a culture in which worker health is viewed as a priority and healthy behaviors are more likely to be adopted by employees. NIOSH conducts research and develops programs to advance this integrated approach through the Total Worker Health program (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/twh).
Because many cancers share risk factors with other diseases and chronic conditions, cancer prevention efforts in the workplace may also be enhanced by coordination with initiatives to address other diseases and chronic conditions. For example, the role of obesity as a risk factor for cancer and type 2 diabetes has been explored in occupational settings (33). This integrated and comprehensive approach maximizes program success and potential for sustainability over time.

Linking With Community Resources

Given the “spillover” that often occurs between work and family lives (2,34), a systems approach addressing the interrelationship between work, family, and community can maximize benefits. For example, employers can partner with organizations in the surrounding community to offer health-related programs and services to employees that complement workplace interventions (http://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/assessment/assessment_interviews/index.html#5). These linkages can extend support to employees when outside the workplace and provide services that are beyond the capacity or expertise of the employer (eg, partnering with local fitness facilities to provide discounted memberships to employees, promoting local farmers markets for access to fresh produce) (35).
Public–private partnerships may also contribute to effectiveness by bringing specialized skills and resources to an intervention (36). Community linkages are particularly important for small and mid-sized employers for whom a lack of resources can be a barrier to implementation and sustainability.

Disparities Across the Workforce

Differences across industries, workplace settings, and types of work create challenges to reaching certain groups and can contribute to cancer health disparities. For example, certain jobs expose workers to chemical and physical hazards (eg, second-hand smoke, excessive sun exposure) or require nonstandard work hours (eg, night shift work) that can contribute to an increased cancer risk (34). Furthermore, not all occupations are found in centralized work locations. Those working outside the typical office setting or without permanent worksites (eg, transportation and construction workers) may benefit from programs that are tailored to their work circumstances and link to other community resources. Additionally, telecommuting has become common among workers, and although the flexibility to telecommute may lend certain benefits, it may also create barriers to reaching employees through traditional worksite wellness programs (34,37).
Health disparities among low-wage and low-income (LW/LI) workers are particularly concerning, as these workers may lack certain protections and worksite benefits available to higher-earning workers and be ineligible for government antipoverty supports (38). Temporary contract workers, seasonal workers, and part-time workers earning low wages tend to face worse working conditions and receive fewer benefits than workers in more permanent positions (34). Women and racial/ethnic minorities are overrepresented among LW/LI workers, further exacerbating health disparities among these groups (34). Health promotion and protection efforts targeting LW/LI workers may help reduce disparities. Such efforts will require buy-in from employers and managers, and potential benefits to employers (eg, reductions in absenteeism) should be highlighted.
Almost half of cancer survivors, individuals who have been given a cancer diagnosis at some point in their lives, are of traditional working age (ie, 18–64 years) (http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/prevalence/prevalence.html#age). Although the unique needs of cancer survivors are outside of the scope of this essay, workplace prevention efforts may also reduce the risk of second primary cancers or cancer recurrence among cancer survivors.

CDC-Supported Program Activities

CDC’s National Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) Program supports states, tribes, and territories to establish coalitions, assess the burden of cancer, determine priorities, and develop and implement cancer plans (http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp/). A scan of activities conducted by CCC programs indicated that only 15 (22%) of 69 programs are engaged in efforts to promote primary cancer prevention in the workplace (J. Townsend, A. Neri, MD, oral communication, July 2013). CCC activities targeting the workplace include general adoption of worksite policies and provision of information about physical activity and nutrition. Some programs are seeking to expand existing prevention-related policies to reach more community members through the workplace setting; others are focused on specific worksites (eg, sun-safety at ski resorts, tobacco exposure in casinos). Identifying low-cost strategies and making them easily available may facilitate further adoption. CCC grantees also provide a strong network for information dissemination through their coalitions as new resources become available.
NIOSH conducts research and develops programs to improve workplace conditions and practices to lower the incidence of occupationally related cancers. NIOSH focuses primarily on industrial sectors, occupations, and populations with elevated risk through basic bench research, on-site health hazard evaluations, recommendations for occupational exposure limits, timely health alerts, and training programs.

CDC-Supported Resources

Many CDC-supported workplace health promotion and protection resources are available (Table 2). For example, CDC provides guidance on smoke- and tobacco-free workplace policies that reduce tobacco use, initiation of tobacco use, and secondhand smoke exposure. Although not necessarily framed in the context of cancer prevention, many other CDC-supported resources address physical inactivity, diet and nutrition, and tobacco use, and some address cancer screening and early detection and weight management. Concerted efforts to share these resources with CCC programs and other funded partners may increase their dissemination and use at the state and local levels. Additionally, the CDC-supported Guide to Community Preventive Services provides evidence-based recommendations for worksite health promotion strategies (http://www.thecommunityguide.org/worksite/index.html). Continuing to link CCC grantees with relevant resources and expertise available in other parts of CDC may help maximize the impact of CDC’s prevention work targeting adults.

Conclusion

The workplace is a key setting for efforts to reduce cancer risk among adults. Although some cancer risk factors have garnered attention in worksite health promotion, others have been somewhat overlooked and may be worth considering for future interventions. More could be done to take advantage of existing resources and prevention networks. Efforts to promote cancer prevention in the workplace may need to take an integrated and comprehensive approach by addressing individual behaviors, organizational culture, policies, and other environmental factors that influence cancer risk. We hope that the information and resources described in this essay will be useful to those working in health promotion and cancer prevention programs targeting adults.

Acknowledgments

Support for this essay was provided by CDC, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC. Members of the Cancer Prevention in the Workplace Writing Group (affiliations at time of contribution to the essay) are Pamela Allweiss, MD, MPH, Division of Diabetes Translation, CDC; David R. Brown, PhD, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, CDC; L. Casey Chosewood, MD, MPH, Total Worker Health Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC; Joan M. Dorn, PhD, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, CDC; Shanta Dube, PhD, MPH, Office on Smoking and Health, CDC; Randy Elder, PhD, MEd, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services, CDC; Dawn M. Holman, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Heidi L. Hudson, MPH, Total Worker Health Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC; C. Dexter Kimsey Jr, PhD, MSEH, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, CDC; Jason E. Lang, MPH, MS, Division of Population Health, CDC; Tina J. Lankford, MPH, Worklife Wellness Office, CDC; Chunyu Li, PhD, MD, MS, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Lisa Muirhead, DNP, APRN, ANP-BC, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Antonio Neri, MD, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Marcus Plescia, MD, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Juan Rodriguez, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Anita L. Schill, PhD, MPH, MA, Total Worker Health Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC; Meredith Shoemaker, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Glorian Sorensen, PhD, MPH, Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Julie Townsend, MS, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC; Mary C. White, ScD, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Dawn M. Holman, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS F76, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-4262. E-mail: dholman@cdc.gov.

References

  1. Anderko L, Roffenbender JS, Goetzel RZ, Howard J, Millard F, Wildenhaus K, et al. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act: workplace wellness. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E175. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2012/12_0092.htm. Accessed February 14, 2014. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Sorensen G, Landsbergis P, Hammer L, Amick BC 3d, Linnan L, Yancey A, et al. Preventing chronic disease in the workplace: a workshop report and recommendations. Am J Public Health 2011;101(Suppl 1):S196–207. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health 2010;100(4):590–5. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Loeppke RR, Schill AL, Chosewood LC, Grosch JW, Allweiss P, Burton WN, et al. Advancing workplace health protection and promotion for an aging workforce. J Occup Environ Med 2013;55(5):500–6. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. White MC, Holman DM, Boehm JE, Peipins LA, Grossman M, Henley SJ. Age and cancer risk: a potentially modifiable relationship. Am J Prev Med 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S7–15. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. World Cancer Research Fund. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington (DC): American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  8. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Asbestos fibers and other elongate mineral particles: state of the science and roadmap for research. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-159/pdfs/2011-159.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malignant mesothelioma mortality — United States, 1999–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58(15):393–6. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5815a3.htm. Accessed June 12, 2014. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 2010;33(7):1674–85. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 National diabetes fact sheet. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/estimates11.htm. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  12. Silverman DT, Samanic CM, Lubin JH, Blair AE, Stewart PA, Vermeulen R, et al. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners study: a nested case–control study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104(11):855–68. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS data brief, no. 131. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2013.
  14. El Ghissassi F, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, Bouvard V, et al. A review of human carcinogens — Part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(8):751–2. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. President’s Cancer Panel. Reducing environmental cancer risk: what we can do now. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2010. http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/annualReports/pcp08-09rpt/PCP_Report_08-09_508.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  16. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Internalized α-particle emitting radionuclides. 2012. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100D/mono100D-9.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  17. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s assessment of risks from radon in homes. 2013. http://www.epa.gov/radon/risk_assessment.html. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  18. Wang Y, Beydoun MA. Meat consumption is associated with obesity and central obesity among US adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33(6):621–8.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Lynch BM. Sedentary behavior and cancer: a systematic review of the literature and proposed biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(11):2691–709. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE 2011;6(5):e19657. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 98: painting, firefighting, and shiftwork. Lyon (FR); 2010. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol98/mono98.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  22. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Workers on flexible and shift schedules in 2004 summary. 2005. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/flex.nr0.htm. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  23. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking — 50 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults — United States, 2004–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60(38):1305–9. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6038a2.htm. Accessed June 12, 2014. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 55: solar and ultraviolet radiation. Lyon (FR); 1997. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol55/volume55.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  26. Holman DM, Berkowitz Z, Guy GP Jr, Hartman AM, Perna FM. The association between demographic and behavioral characteristics and sunburn among U.S. adults — National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Med 2014;63:6–12. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National Health Interview Survey: Occupational Health Supplement. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nhis/healthcareoccsa/hcoccsafig13.html. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  28. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 2010;140(10):1832–8. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  29. Marriott BP, Olsho L, Hadden L, Connor P. Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2010;50(3):228–58. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities — United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62(17):326–30. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6217a2.htm. Accessed June 12, 2014. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  31. Database of state indoor air quality laws. Database excerpt: radon laws. Washington (DC): Environmental Law Institute; 2013. http://www.eli.org/buildings/database-state-indoor-air-quality-laws. Accessed April 30, 2014.
  32. Alley DE, Chang VW. Metabolic syndrome and weight gain in adulthood. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010;65(1):111–7. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  33. Pandalai SP, Schulte PA, Miller DB. Conceptual heuristic models of the interrelationships between obesity and the occupational environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39(3):221–32. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  34. Burgard SA, Lin KY. Bad jobs, bad health? How work and working conditions contribute to health disparities. Am Behav Sci 2013;57(8):1105–27.CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  35. Bunnell R, O’Neil D, Soler R, Payne R, Giles WH, Collins J, et al. Fifty communities putting prevention to work: accelerating chronic disease prevention through policy, systems and environmental change. J Community Health 2012;37(5):1081–90. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  36. McDonnell S, Bryant C, Harris J, Campbell MK, Lobb A, Hannon P, et al. The private partners of public health: public–private alliances for public good. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6(2):A69. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/apr/08_0213.htm. Accessed April 21, 2014. PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  37. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol 2007;92(6):1524–41. CrossRefExternal Web Site Icon PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  38. Albelda R, Carr M. Low-wage and low-income workers in the U.S., 1979–2009. Boston (MA): Center for Social Policy; 2012.

No hay comentarios: