Is it time to move beyond errors in clinical reasoning and discuss accuracy?
Wood TJ. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19:403-407.
Highlighting how heuristics can both increase and reduce risk of diagnostic error, this commentary applies a set of recommended criteria to examine its usefulness in guiding research and augmenting understanding about factors that affect clinical reasoning and support accurate decision making.
PubMed citation
Available at
Related journal article
Related Resources
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
For second opinion, consult a computer?Hafner K. New York Times. December 3, 2012.
For second opinion, consult a computer?Hafner K. New York Times. December 3, 2012.
COMMENTARY
From mindless to mindful practice—cognitive bias and clinical decision making.Croskerry P. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2445-2448.
From mindless to mindful practice—cognitive bias and clinical decision making.Croskerry P. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2445-2448.
COMMENTARY
Cognitive debiasing—part 1 and part 2.Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(supp 2):58-72.
Cognitive debiasing—part 1 and part 2.Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(supp 2):58-72.
SPECIAL OR THEME ISSUE
Diagnostic Error in Medicine.Singh H, ed. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(suppl 2):ii1-ii72.
View all related resources...
Diagnostic Error in Medicine.Singh H, ed. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(suppl 2):ii1-ii72.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario