sábado, 24 de junio de 2017

Medical students’ perspectives on euthanasia | NEXT JULY 21 | BioEdge |

Medical students’ perspectives on euthanasia

Medical students’ perspectives on euthanasia
What do medical students think about euthanasia? A new article in the journal Chest discusses some of the concerns held by the next generation of US medical professionals.  The authors of the paper, students from several of the leading medical schools in the country, express grave concerns about the normalisation of euthanasia in end-of-life care.

Commenting on new legislation introduced in US states such as Colorado, the authors remark:

The sum of these new laws and rulings strongly conveys the impression that once a person is eligible for hospice, his or her life may no longer have worth, and a “healthy” and “reasonable” thing to do is to request to end one’s own life. We reject this proposed shift of the true purpose of medicine, and we reject the pressure to legitimize this shift through the involvement of medical professionals in an act fundamentally antithetical to our core ethical principles.
Doctor-patient trust, the authors assert, is founded upon the notion that doctors “will commit to doing their best to heal and care for patients and will not intentionally kill those entrusted to their care”. The students fear that PAS/E violates the fundamental bond of trust.

Indeed, the authors call upon doctors to return to the original meaning of euthanasia:

“In its first studies in the 19th century, "euthanasia" was originally defined as focusing on improving patients' quality of life and easing the process at the end of life, but never at the expense of promoting practices which could hasten a patient's death. We strongly implore our present and future colleagues to return to this original definition.”
The American Medical Student Association currently has a position of conditional support for physician aid in dying.
Saturday, June 24, 2017
There is plenty of variety in this week’s BioEdge: a euthanasia pioneer surveys its progress in the Netherlands; a neuroethicist despairs over ‘fake news’; a legal expert assesses the chances of Noel Conway’s assisted dying request in the UK; an important new paper asks whether puberty suppression for transgender kids is ethical...
But the big news is that BioEdge (and its editor) are taking a solstitial holiday for a few weeks. The next issue will arrive on about July 21.

Michael Cook




by Michael Cook | Jun 24, 2017
What we need is effective 'nudges to reason', says Neil Levy

by Xavier Symons | Jun 24, 2017
The government of Texas will allow clinics across the state to market unapproved stem-cell therapies.

by Michael Cook | Jun 24, 2017
Did psychologists use data from torture to test their hypotheses?

by Michael Cook | Jun 24, 2017
Unless doctors are safe, they can't work; to be safe, they have to work for the Army

by Xavier Symons | Jun 24, 2017
The man who brought us the first three-parent baby is now going commercial.

by Michael Cook | Jun 24, 2017
Parents of transgender kids have enrolled them in a dangerous experiment

by Michael Cook | Jun 24, 2017
Safeguards for the mentally ill and the demented are slipping away

by Xavier Symons | Jun 24, 2017
Students are concerned about the impact of euthanasia on the medical landscape.


by Clark Hobson | Jun 24, 2017
Although Parliament is clearly opposed, a way is opening in the courts
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615

No hay comentarios: